<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>apt, branch 2.1.7</title>
<subtitle>Debians commandline package manager</subtitle>
<id>https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/atom?h=2.1.7</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/atom?h=2.1.7'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/'/>
<updated>2020-07-08T07:40:38Z</updated>
<entry>
<title>Release 2.1.7</title>
<updated>2020-07-08T07:40:38Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Julian Andres Klode</name>
<email>julian.klode@canonical.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-07-08T07:40:38Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/commit/?id=f21ca6d73dacc277e0b3d7a8fa15b2c30633d3ae'/>
<id>urn:sha1:f21ca6d73dacc277e0b3d7a8fa15b2c30633d3ae</id>
<content type='text'>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Detect pkg-config-dpkghook failure in tests to avoid fallback</title>
<updated>2020-07-07T17:55:58Z</updated>
<author>
<name>David Kalnischkies</name>
<email>david@kalnischkies.de</email>
</author>
<published>2020-07-07T17:55:58Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/commit/?id=3fe1419433f195d57b948b100b218cf14a2841d0'/>
<id>urn:sha1:3fe1419433f195d57b948b100b218cf14a2841d0</id>
<content type='text'>
dpkg (&gt;= 1.20.3) has better support for its own DPKG_ROOT resulting in
architectures for the root being reported rather than the host system.
Sadly the hookscript from pkg-config is not prepared for this resulting
in our `dpkg --add-architecture` calls failing in the hook after dpkg
has successfully added the architecture internally. The failure
triggered fallback handling in the tests to work with an older version
of dpkg with a different multi-arch implementation.

So instead of doing the fallback, we ignore the failure if it seems like
pkg-config-dpkghook is involved only producing a bunch of warnings
to hint at this problem, but otherwise make the tests work again as it
is a post-invoke script.

References: #824774
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Fix test due to display change in ls (coreutils 8.32)</title>
<updated>2020-07-07T17:13:38Z</updated>
<author>
<name>David Kalnischkies</name>
<email>david@kalnischkies.de</email>
</author>
<published>2020-07-07T17:08:29Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/commit/?id=d9b9484b4af2a21c3f5dea6ec10a3128e7304d07'/>
<id>urn:sha1:d9b9484b4af2a21c3f5dea6ec10a3128e7304d07</id>
<content type='text'>
The test runs ls on the opened fds and greps the result for 'root root'
which is how ls (&lt;= 8.30) used to report user and group for these. Now
that Debian contains 8.32 it reports user and group of the process
owning them (supposedly). grepping for both unbreaks the test.

lr-x------ 1 root root 64 Jul  7 19:07 0 -&gt; 'pipe:[10458045]'
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Jul  7 19:07 1 -&gt; /dev/pts/12
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Jul  7 19:07 2 -&gt; /dev/pts/12
lr-x------ 1 root root 64 Jul  7 19:07 3 -&gt; /proc/1266484/fd

vs (assuming user:group is david:david)

lr-x------ 1 david david 64 Jul  7 19:07 0 -&gt; 'pipe:[10458045]'
lrwx------ 1 david david 64 Jul  7 19:07 1 -&gt; /dev/pts/12
lrwx------ 1 david david 64 Jul  7 19:07 2 -&gt; /dev/pts/12
lr-x------ 1 david david 64 Jul  7 19:07 3 -&gt; /proc/1266484/fd
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Reorder config check before result looping for SRV parsing debug</title>
<updated>2020-07-02T16:57:11Z</updated>
<author>
<name>David Kalnischkies</name>
<email>david@kalnischkies.de</email>
</author>
<published>2020-06-30T08:11:09Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/commit/?id=1bfc0907c987758529bcdc4ebfb34364702a2d8b'/>
<id>urn:sha1:1bfc0907c987758529bcdc4ebfb34364702a2d8b</id>
<content type='text'>
It isn't needed to iterate over all results if we will be doing nothing
anyhow as it isn't that common to have that debug option enabled.
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Reorder config check before checking systemd for non-interactive http</title>
<updated>2020-07-02T16:57:11Z</updated>
<author>
<name>David Kalnischkies</name>
<email>david@kalnischkies.de</email>
</author>
<published>2020-06-26T21:42:29Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/commit/?id=abba628268308c7c23f168f01966a88fe208885e'/>
<id>urn:sha1:abba628268308c7c23f168f01966a88fe208885e</id>
<content type='text'>
If this option is disabled (which it is by default in Debian), we don't
have to make the call and the checks around it. Not that it really
matters that much as if it would we would be better checking only once.
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Dutch program translation update</title>
<updated>2020-07-02T16:57:11Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Frans Spiesschaert</name>
<email>Frans.Spiesschaert@yucom.be</email>
</author>
<published>2020-06-26T20:19:07Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/commit/?id=a976aa30c87d4ea437979257d3065b634323eb98'/>
<id>urn:sha1:a976aa30c87d4ea437979257d3065b634323eb98</id>
<content type='text'>
Closes: #963008
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Add dependency points in the resolver also to providers</title>
<updated>2020-07-02T16:57:11Z</updated>
<author>
<name>David Kalnischkies</name>
<email>david@kalnischkies.de</email>
</author>
<published>2020-06-19T16:49:11Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/commit/?id=1f910d94add8f20ebfa5999a7795e678a4af0826'/>
<id>urn:sha1:1f910d94add8f20ebfa5999a7795e678a4af0826</id>
<content type='text'>
We were traditionally adding points for some dependency types to the
real package, but we should also do it for providers of that package to
help the resolver especially if the real package is for some reason not
tagged for removal yet/anymore.

While at it we ensure that the points are only attributed once for each
package as especially with versioned provides a package can nowadays
provide another many times and would hence acquire a lot of points.
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Filter out impossible solutions for protected propagation</title>
<updated>2020-07-02T16:57:11Z</updated>
<author>
<name>David Kalnischkies</name>
<email>david@kalnischkies.de</email>
</author>
<published>2020-06-19T11:58:35Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/commit/?id=cfd0172fb0eeb15b2e2427c0e11b2ec65f501839'/>
<id>urn:sha1:cfd0172fb0eeb15b2e2427c0e11b2ec65f501839</id>
<content type='text'>
If the package providing the given solution is tagged already for
removal (or at least for "not installing") we can ignore this solution
as a possibility as it is not one, which means we can avoid exploring
the option and potentially forward the protected flag further if that
helps in reducing the possibilities to a single one.
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Delay removals due to Conflicts until Depends are resolved</title>
<updated>2020-07-02T16:57:11Z</updated>
<author>
<name>David Kalnischkies</name>
<email>david@kalnischkies.de</email>
</author>
<published>2020-06-19T11:14:33Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/commit/?id=3e39efa31da463ca05016513835d9a5388f80f90'/>
<id>urn:sha1:3e39efa31da463ca05016513835d9a5388f80f90</id>
<content type='text'>
Marking a package for removal is fine if we know that we have to remove
that package, but if we are in an alternative branch we might not go
this route in the end and hence have a package pointlessly marked for
removal which isn't questioned later on.

We check if we are allowed to remove that package to avoid working on
the positive dependencies if not, but we mark them for removal only
after all the other dependencies are successfully resolved.

In an ideal world we would let the problemResolver do its job on them,
but the resolver might decide against doing the removal exploring
another option like the next alternative, which might be a good idea,
but is not the behaviour we had before, so that is the best we can do
for now without changing the resolver drastically.
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Merge branch 'patch-1' into 'master'</title>
<updated>2020-07-01T07:02:50Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Julian Andres Klode</name>
<email>jak@debian.org</email>
</author>
<published>2020-07-01T07:02:50Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/commit/?id=289ee74dd23cba7e08b08c6c3602bcf4bf8167bc'/>
<id>urn:sha1:289ee74dd23cba7e08b08c6c3602bcf4bf8167bc</id>
<content type='text'>
Minor Catalan grammar typo

See merge request apt-team/apt!123</content>
</entry>
</feed>
