apt/apt-pkg/cdrom.cc, branch 1.2.10

Fix several typos

2016-03-06T23:14:48Z

This effectively merges branch 'typofixes-vlajos-20150807' of github.com:vlajos/apt with the following commit: commit 13cacb3e2e2352ba701e769fc889e3344fabbf7e Author: Veres Lajos Date: Sun Aug 9 00:12:53 2015 +0100 typofix - https://github.com/vlajos/misspell_fixer It has been rebased for a better commit message.

outsmart gcc -O3 over-optimization in pkgCdrom::FindPackages

2015-11-27T21:22:21Z

Seems like a simpler workaround than forcing a lower optimization level just for this for all of apt. See also: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-5/+bug/1473674

wrap every unlink call to check for != /dev/null

2015-11-04T17:42:28Z

Unlinking /dev/null is bad, we shouldn't do that. Also, we should print at least a warning if we tried to unlink a file but didn't manage to pull it of (ignoring the case were the file is /dev/null or doesn't exist in the first place). This got triggered by a relatively unlikely to cause problem in pkgAcquire::Worker::PrepareFiles which would while temporary uncompressed files (which are set to keep compressed) figure out that to files are the same and prepare for sharing by deleting them. Bad move. That also shows why not printing a warning is a bad idea as this hide the error for in non-root test runs. Git-Dch: Ignore

support arch:all data e.g. in separate Packages file

2015-11-04T17:42:27Z

Based on a discussion with Niels Thykier who asked for Contents-all this implements apt trying for all architecture dependent files to get a file for the architecture all, which is treated internally now as an official architecture which is always around (like native). This way arch:all data can be shared instead of duplicated for each architecture requiring the user to download the same information again and again. There is one problem however: In Debian there is already a binary-all/ Packages file, but the binary-any files still include arch:all packages, so that downloading this file now would be a waste of time, bandwidth and diskspace. We therefore need a way to decide if it makes sense to download the all file for Packages in Debian or not. The obvious answer would be a special flag in the Release file indicating this, which would need to default to 'no' and every reasonable repository would override it to 'yes' in a few years time, but the flag would be there "forever". Looking closer at a Release file we see the field "Architectures", which doesn't include 'all' at the moment. With the idea outlined above that 'all' is a "proper" architecture now, we interpret this field as being authoritative in declaring which architectures are supported by this repository. If it says 'all', apt will try to get all, if not it will be skipped. This gives us another interesting feature: If I configure a source to download armel and mips, but it declares it supports only armel apt will now print a notice saying as much. Previously this was a very cryptic failure. If on the other hand the repository supports mips, too, but for some reason doesn't ship mips packages at the moment, this 'missing' file is silently ignored (= that is the same as the repository including an empty file). The Architectures field isn't mandatory through, so if it isn't there, we assume that every architecture is supported by this repository, which skips the arch:all if not listed in the release file.

Really fix all iwyu issues

2015-08-17T13:49:20Z

Git-Dch: ignore

Fix all the wrong removals of includes that iwyu got wrong

2015-08-17T12:29:02Z

Git-Dch: ignore

Cleanup includes after running iwyu

2015-08-17T10:01:45Z

make all d-pointer * const pointers

2015-08-10T15:25:25Z

Doing this disables the implicit copy assignment operator (among others) which would cause hovac if used on the classes as it would just copy the pointer, not the data the d-pointer points to. For most of the classes we don't need a copy assignment operator anyway and in many classes it was broken before as many contain a pointer of some sort. Only for our Cacheset Container interfaces we define an explicit copy assignment operator which could later be implemented to copy the data from one d-pointer to the other if we need it. Git-Dch: Ignore

add d-pointer, virtual destructors and de-inline de/constructors

2015-06-16T14:22:46Z

To have a chance to keep the ABI for a while we need all three to team up. One of them missing and we might loose, so ensuring that they are available is a very tedious but needed task once in a while. Git-Dch: Ignore

ensure lists/ files have correct permissions after apt-cdrom add

2015-04-18T23:13:09Z

Its a bit unpredictable which permissons and owners we will encounter on a CD-ROM (or a USB stick, as apt-cdrom is responsible for those too), so we have to ensure in this codepath as well that everything is nicely setup without waiting for a 'apt-get update' to fix up the (potential) mess.