Debians commandline package manager https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/atom?h=2.7.0 2023-05-02T14:46:14Z 2023-05-02T14:46:14Z Julian Andres Klode julian.klode@canonical.com 2023-05-02T14:46:14Z urn:sha1:9da15d149f97e0f26cf5b7e32405512a5e63523c 2023-05-02T13:23:14Z Julian Andres Klode julian.klode@canonical.com 2023-02-22T13:14:52Z urn:sha1:a19f606aad717fe5c9c69237c3af53feb547115e Provide snapshot support for offical Debian and Ubuntu archives. There are two ways to enable snapshots for sources: 1. Add Snapshot: yes to your sources file ([snapshot=yes]). This will allow you to specify a snapshot to use when updating or installing using the --snapshot,-S option. 2. Add Snapshot: ID to your sources files to request a specific snapshot for this source. Snapshots are discovered using Label and Origin fields in the Release file of the main source, hence you need to have updated the source at least once before you can use snapshots. The Release file may also declare a snapshots server to use, similar to Changelogs, it can contain a Snapshots field with the values: 1. `Snapshots: https://example.com/@SNAPSHOTID@` where `@SNAPSHOTID@` is a placeholder that is replaced with the requested snapshot id 2. `Snapshots: no` to disable snapshot support for this source. Requesting snapshots for this source will result in a failure to load the source. The implementation adds a SHADOWED option to deb source entries, and marks the main entry as SHADOWED when a snapshot has been requested, which will cause it to be updated, but not included in the generated cache. The concern here was that we need to keep generating the shadowed entries because the cleanup in `apt update` deletes any files not queued for download, so we gotta keep downloading the main source. This design is not entirely optimal, but avoids the pitfalls of having to reimplement list cleanup. Gaps: - Ubuntu Pro repositories and PPAs are not yet supported. 2023-05-02T13:16:54Z Julian Andres Klode julian.klode@canonical.com 2023-04-11T14:37:51Z urn:sha1:3625351722e67903dc34993fe318e50863bd2d31 This runs update before opening the cache and sources.list for installing/upgrading. 2023-03-06T12:30:01Z Julian Andres Klode julian.klode@canonical.com 2023-03-06T12:30:01Z urn:sha1:aa8c9aad81b57da96e8ac7345d0024ee526c7714 2023-02-27T09:28:15Z Julian Andres Klode julian.klode@canonical.com 2023-02-27T09:27:56Z urn:sha1:b20ec1c48762963fac189fac7c6040dde115ba80 2023-02-27T09:21:24Z Julian Andres Klode jak@debian.org 2023-02-27T09:21:24Z urn:sha1:f98732f703601a8db67527b1b82f3296290f2dc1 Support transition to new non-free-firmware component See merge request apt-team/apt!282 2023-02-08T16:09:26Z Julian Andres Klode julian.klode@canonical.com 2023-02-08T16:07:41Z urn:sha1:028b4d08f09e14c1e6f5e071f329668870bc5e56 2023-02-04T16:56:41Z David Kalnischkies david@kalnischkies.de 2023-01-29T22:24:43Z urn:sha1:9712edf6151308148518058bfbd5ccd937509143 In an ideal world everyone would read release notes, but if the last sources.list change is any indication a lot of people wont. This is even more a problem in so far as apt isn't producing errors for invalid repositories, but instead carries on as normal even through it will not be able to install upgrades for the moved packages. This commit implements two scenarios and prints a notice in those cases pointing to the release notes: a) User has 'non-free' but not 'non-free-firmware' b) User has a firmware package which isn't available from anywhere Both only happen if we are talking about a repository which identifies itself as one of Debian and is for a release codenamed bookworm (or sid). Note that as (usually) apt/oldstable is used to upgrade to the new stable release these suggestions only show for users after they have upgraded to bookworm on apt command line usage after that. 2023-01-29T23:55:30Z David Kalnischkies david@kalnischkies.de 2023-01-29T18:16:24Z urn:sha1:7ae8bb8d9942d51bd89fd34af6d2561d7616d393 2023-01-29T23:55:30Z David Kalnischkies david@kalnischkies.de 2023-01-29T16:30:28Z urn:sha1:7e7eb113587230aeb9fe745b2eeac44e634999f5 This changes a lot of lines technically, but its easy enough to unfuzzy the translations as most of the mentions are examples to be copied literally in translations (sadly po4a isn't clever enough for this).