Debians commandline package manager https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/atom?h=1.3_rc1 2016-08-10T21:51:35Z 2016-08-10T21:51:35Z David Kalnischkies david@kalnischkies.de 2016-07-28T07:13:24Z urn:sha1:28557f94578602f9ce0011501a2259bd98ab0688 With b4450f1dd6bca537e60406b2383ab154a3e1485f we dropped what we calculated here later on and now that we don't need it in the meantime either we can just skip the busy work by default and expect dpkg to do the right thing dropping also our little "last explicit configures" removal trick introduced in b4450f1dd6bca537e60406b2383ab154a3e1485f. This enables the last of a bunch of previously experimental options, some of them existing still, but are very special and hence not really worth documenting anymore (especially as it would need to be rewritten now entirely) which is why the documentation is nearly completely dropped. The order of configuration stanzas in the simulation code changes slightly as it isn't concerning itself with finding the 'right' order, but any order is valid anyhow as long as the entire set happens in the same call. 2016-07-15T19:59:10Z David Kalnischkies david@kalnischkies.de 2016-07-15T19:17:11Z urn:sha1:87f99f6fa701d2557811134380c1f232cf07a422 Most tests are either multiarch, do not care for the specific architecture or do not interact with dpkg, so really effect by this is only test-external-installation-planner-protocol, but its a general issue that while APT can be told to treat any architecture as native dpkg has the native architecture hardcoded so if we run tests we must make sure that dpkg knows about the architecture we will treat as "native" in apt as otherwise dpkg will refuse to install packages from such an architecture. This reverts f883d2c3675eae2700e4cd1532c1a236cae69a4e as it complicates the test slightly for no practical gain after the generic fix. 2016-07-15T12:28:14Z Julian Andres Klode jak@debian.org 2016-07-15T12:15:59Z urn:sha1:f883d2c3675eae2700e4cd1532c1a236cae69a4e Hardcoding amd64 broke the tests. 2016-06-29T10:17:41Z David Kalnischkies david@kalnischkies.de 2016-06-29T07:16:53Z urn:sha1:8e99b22c31eb47d0422e9a69e83dc99bb315ded8 Julian noticed on IRC that I fall victim to a lovely false friend by calling referring to a 'planer' all the time even through these are machines to e.g. remove splinters from woodwork ("make stuff plane"). The term I meant is written in german in this way (= with a single n) but in english there are two, aka: 'planner'. As that is unreleased code switching all instances without any transitional provisions. Also the reason why its skipped in changelog. Thanks: Julian Andres Klode Gbp-Dch: Ignore