<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>apt/test/libapt/acqprogress_test.cc, branch 2.7.11</title>
<subtitle>Debians commandline package manager</subtitle>
<id>https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/atom?h=2.7.11</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/atom?h=2.7.11'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/'/>
<updated>2017-07-12T11:57:51Z</updated>
<entry>
<title>Reformat and sort all includes with clang-format</title>
<updated>2017-07-12T11:57:51Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Julian Andres Klode</name>
<email>jak@debian.org</email>
</author>
<published>2017-07-12T11:40:41Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/commit/?id=87274d0f22e1dfd99b2e5200e2fe75c1b804eac3'/>
<id>urn:sha1:87274d0f22e1dfd99b2e5200e2fe75c1b804eac3</id>
<content type='text'>
This makes it easier to see which headers includes what.

The changes were done by running

    git grep -l '#\s*include'  \
        | grep -E '.(cc|h)$' \
        | xargs sed -i -E 's/(^\s*)#(\s*)include/\1#\2 include/'

To modify all include lines by adding a space, and then running
./git-clang-format.sh.
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>apply various suggestions made by cppcheck</title>
<updated>2015-11-05T11:21:33Z</updated>
<author>
<name>David Kalnischkies</name>
<email>david@kalnischkies.de</email>
</author>
<published>2015-11-04T20:08:55Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/commit/?id=258b9e512c4001e806c5c0966acecd3d742ec6e9'/>
<id>urn:sha1:258b9e512c4001e806c5c0966acecd3d742ec6e9</id>
<content type='text'>
Reported-By: cppcheck
Git-Dch: Ignore
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>add c++11 override marker to overridden methods</title>
<updated>2015-08-10T15:27:17Z</updated>
<author>
<name>David Kalnischkies</name>
<email>david@kalnischkies.de</email>
</author>
<published>2015-07-08T22:35:40Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/commit/?id=3b3028467ceccca0b73a8f53051c0fa4de313111'/>
<id>urn:sha1:3b3028467ceccca0b73a8f53051c0fa4de313111</id>
<content type='text'>
C++11 adds the 'override' specifier to mark that a method is overriding
a base class method and error out if not. We hide it in the APT_OVERRIDE
macro to ensure that we keep compiling in pre-c++11 standards.

Reported-By: clang-modernize -add-override -override-macros
Git-Dch: Ignore
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>add d-pointer, virtual destructors and de-inline de/constructors</title>
<updated>2015-06-16T14:22:46Z</updated>
<author>
<name>David Kalnischkies</name>
<email>david@kalnischkies.de</email>
</author>
<published>2015-06-16T14:22:46Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/commit/?id=c8a4ce6cbed57ae108dc955d4a850f9b129a0693'/>
<id>urn:sha1:c8a4ce6cbed57ae108dc955d4a850f9b129a0693</id>
<content type='text'>
To have a chance to keep the ABI for a while we need all three to team
up. One of them missing and we might loose, so ensuring that they are
available is a very tedious but needed task once in a while.

Git-Dch: Ignore
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>rework hashsum verification in the acquire system</title>
<updated>2015-06-09T10:57:35Z</updated>
<author>
<name>David Kalnischkies</name>
<email>david@kalnischkies.de</email>
</author>
<published>2015-06-06T10:28:00Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/commit/?id=448c38bdcd72b52f11ec5f326f822cf57653f81c'/>
<id>urn:sha1:448c38bdcd72b52f11ec5f326f822cf57653f81c</id>
<content type='text'>
Having every item having its own code to verify the file(s) it handles
is an errorprune process and easy to break, especially if items move
through various stages (download, uncompress, patching, …). With a giant
rework we centralize (most of) the verification to have a better
enforcement rate and (hopefully) less chance for bugs, but it breaks the
ABI bigtime in exchange – and as we break it anyway, it is broken even
harder.

It shouldn't effect most frontends as they don't deal with the acquire
system at all or implement their own items, but some do and will need to
be patched (might be an opportunity to use apt on-board material).

The theory is simple: Items implement methods to decide if hashes need to
be checked (in this stage) and to return the expected hashes for this
item (in this stage). The verification itself is done in worker message
passing which has the benefit that a hashsum error is now a proper error
for the acquire system rather than a Done() which is later revised to a
Failed().
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>add a simple unit test for acquire progress</title>
<updated>2015-04-10T20:29:08Z</updated>
<author>
<name>David Kalnischkies</name>
<email>david@kalnischkies.de</email>
</author>
<published>2015-03-15T21:34:54Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/commit/?id=dfad5beea77d75983f6ff8a1b8296b74dd48203e'/>
<id>urn:sha1:dfad5beea77d75983f6ff8a1b8296b74dd48203e</id>
<content type='text'>
This isn't testing much of the 'complex' parts,
but its better than nothing for now.

Git-Dch: Ignore
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
