<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>apt/test, branch 2.1.12</title>
<subtitle>Debians commandline package manager</subtitle>
<id>https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/atom?h=2.1.12</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/atom?h=2.1.12'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/'/>
<updated>2020-11-06T09:51:06Z</updated>
<entry>
<title>Do not immediately configure m-a: same packages in lockstep</title>
<updated>2020-11-06T09:51:06Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Julian Andres Klode</name>
<email>julian.klode@canonical.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-10-08T09:50:19Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/commit/?id=2b13473a9b9947f55a0871d146e4fee456b0af60'/>
<id>urn:sha1:2b13473a9b9947f55a0871d146e4fee456b0af60</id>
<content type='text'>
In LP#835625, it was reported that apt did not unpack multi-arch
packages in the correct order, and dpkg did not like that. The fix
also made apt configure packages together, which is not strictly
necessary.

This turned out to cause issues now, because of dependencies on
libc6:i386 that caused immediate configuration of that to not
work.

Work around the issue by not configuring multi-arch: same packages
in lockstep if they have the immediate flag set. This will be the
pseudo-essential set, and given how essential works, we mostly need
the native arch to work correctly anyway.

LP: #1871268
Regression-Of: 30426f4822516bdd26528aa2e6d8d69c1291c8d3
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>pkgnames: Do not exclude virtual packages with --all-names</title>
<updated>2020-10-26T13:39:44Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Julian Andres Klode</name>
<email>julian.klode@canonical.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-10-26T13:39:44Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/commit/?id=681f74a8bd5beaad5b821a5c4eb3c0bc1c471669'/>
<id>urn:sha1:681f74a8bd5beaad5b821a5c4eb3c0bc1c471669</id>
<content type='text'>
We accidentally excluded virtual packages by excluding every
group that had a package, but where the package had no versions.

Rewrite the code so the lookup consistently uses VersionList()
instead of FirstVersion and FindPkg("any") - those are all the
same, and this is easier to read.
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>pkgnames: Correctly set the default for AllNames to false</title>
<updated>2020-10-26T13:33:55Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Julian Andres Klode</name>
<email>julian.klode@canonical.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-10-26T12:54:26Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/commit/?id=9cc002939afc0d2283fd2f5e7d6e7434af5d10ff'/>
<id>urn:sha1:9cc002939afc0d2283fd2f5e7d6e7434af5d10ff</id>
<content type='text'>
We passed "false" instead of false, and that apparently got
cast to bool, because it's a non-null pointer.

LP: #1876495
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Default Acquire::AllowReleaseInfoChange::Suite to "true"</title>
<updated>2020-08-10T13:39:33Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Julian Andres Klode</name>
<email>julian.klode@canonical.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-08-10T13:39:33Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/commit/?id=64b45e294f0c6931a9b57ae6cc99ecded8f6a2d3'/>
<id>urn:sha1:64b45e294f0c6931a9b57ae6cc99ecded8f6a2d3</id>
<content type='text'>
Closes: #931566
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Replace whitelist/blacklist with allowlist/denylist</title>
<updated>2020-08-04T10:12:11Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Julian Andres Klode</name>
<email>julian.klode@canonical.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-07-14T14:34:20Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/commit/?id=7d8bb855487d6821b0cd6bf5d2270ed8fda3d1a3'/>
<id>urn:sha1:7d8bb855487d6821b0cd6bf5d2270ed8fda3d1a3</id>
<content type='text'>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>aptwebserver: Rename slaves to workers</title>
<updated>2020-08-04T10:12:10Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Julian Andres Klode</name>
<email>julian.klode@canonical.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-07-14T14:06:44Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/commit/?id=264137c679fb0d3c1f476dcb4ae207abc601b0b2'/>
<id>urn:sha1:264137c679fb0d3c1f476dcb4ae207abc601b0b2</id>
<content type='text'>
Apologies.
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Detect pkg-config-dpkghook failure in tests to avoid fallback</title>
<updated>2020-07-07T17:55:58Z</updated>
<author>
<name>David Kalnischkies</name>
<email>david@kalnischkies.de</email>
</author>
<published>2020-07-07T17:55:58Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/commit/?id=3fe1419433f195d57b948b100b218cf14a2841d0'/>
<id>urn:sha1:3fe1419433f195d57b948b100b218cf14a2841d0</id>
<content type='text'>
dpkg (&gt;= 1.20.3) has better support for its own DPKG_ROOT resulting in
architectures for the root being reported rather than the host system.
Sadly the hookscript from pkg-config is not prepared for this resulting
in our `dpkg --add-architecture` calls failing in the hook after dpkg
has successfully added the architecture internally. The failure
triggered fallback handling in the tests to work with an older version
of dpkg with a different multi-arch implementation.

So instead of doing the fallback, we ignore the failure if it seems like
pkg-config-dpkghook is involved only producing a bunch of warnings
to hint at this problem, but otherwise make the tests work again as it
is a post-invoke script.

References: #824774
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Fix test due to display change in ls (coreutils 8.32)</title>
<updated>2020-07-07T17:13:38Z</updated>
<author>
<name>David Kalnischkies</name>
<email>david@kalnischkies.de</email>
</author>
<published>2020-07-07T17:08:29Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/commit/?id=d9b9484b4af2a21c3f5dea6ec10a3128e7304d07'/>
<id>urn:sha1:d9b9484b4af2a21c3f5dea6ec10a3128e7304d07</id>
<content type='text'>
The test runs ls on the opened fds and greps the result for 'root root'
which is how ls (&lt;= 8.30) used to report user and group for these. Now
that Debian contains 8.32 it reports user and group of the process
owning them (supposedly). grepping for both unbreaks the test.

lr-x------ 1 root root 64 Jul  7 19:07 0 -&gt; 'pipe:[10458045]'
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Jul  7 19:07 1 -&gt; /dev/pts/12
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Jul  7 19:07 2 -&gt; /dev/pts/12
lr-x------ 1 root root 64 Jul  7 19:07 3 -&gt; /proc/1266484/fd

vs (assuming user:group is david:david)

lr-x------ 1 david david 64 Jul  7 19:07 0 -&gt; 'pipe:[10458045]'
lrwx------ 1 david david 64 Jul  7 19:07 1 -&gt; /dev/pts/12
lrwx------ 1 david david 64 Jul  7 19:07 2 -&gt; /dev/pts/12
lr-x------ 1 david david 64 Jul  7 19:07 3 -&gt; /proc/1266484/fd
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Add dependency points in the resolver also to providers</title>
<updated>2020-07-02T16:57:11Z</updated>
<author>
<name>David Kalnischkies</name>
<email>david@kalnischkies.de</email>
</author>
<published>2020-06-19T16:49:11Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/commit/?id=1f910d94add8f20ebfa5999a7795e678a4af0826'/>
<id>urn:sha1:1f910d94add8f20ebfa5999a7795e678a4af0826</id>
<content type='text'>
We were traditionally adding points for some dependency types to the
real package, but we should also do it for providers of that package to
help the resolver especially if the real package is for some reason not
tagged for removal yet/anymore.

While at it we ensure that the points are only attributed once for each
package as especially with versioned provides a package can nowadays
provide another many times and would hence acquire a lot of points.
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Filter out impossible solutions for protected propagation</title>
<updated>2020-07-02T16:57:11Z</updated>
<author>
<name>David Kalnischkies</name>
<email>david@kalnischkies.de</email>
</author>
<published>2020-06-19T11:58:35Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/commit/?id=cfd0172fb0eeb15b2e2427c0e11b2ec65f501839'/>
<id>urn:sha1:cfd0172fb0eeb15b2e2427c0e11b2ec65f501839</id>
<content type='text'>
If the package providing the given solution is tagged already for
removal (or at least for "not installing") we can ignore this solution
as a possibility as it is not one, which means we can avoid exploring
the option and potentially forward the protected flag further if that
helps in reducing the possibilities to a single one.
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
