<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>apt/test, branch 2.1.2</title>
<subtitle>Debians commandline package manager</subtitle>
<id>https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/atom?h=2.1.2</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/atom?h=2.1.2'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/'/>
<updated>2020-05-13T20:04:13Z</updated>
<entry>
<title>Fix location of testdeb in added regression tests</title>
<updated>2020-05-13T20:04:13Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Julian Andres Klode</name>
<email>julian.klode@canonical.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-05-13T08:51:10Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/commit/?id=3368ae121112405259288c9139a300dc0cac31fe'/>
<id>urn:sha1:3368ae121112405259288c9139a300dc0cac31fe</id>
<content type='text'>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>SECURITY UPDATE: Fix out of bounds read in .ar and .tar implementation (CVE-2020-3810)</title>
<updated>2020-05-12T16:55:55Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Julian Andres Klode</name>
<email>julian.klode@canonical.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-05-12T09:49:09Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/commit/?id=dceb1e49e4b8e4dadaf056be34088b415939cda6'/>
<id>urn:sha1:dceb1e49e4b8e4dadaf056be34088b415939cda6</id>
<content type='text'>
When normalizing ar member names by removing trailing whitespace
and slashes, an out-out-bound read can be caused if the ar member
name consists only of such characters, because the code did not
stop at 0, but would wrap around and continue reading from the
stack, without any limit.

Add a check to abort if we reached the first character in the
name, effectively rejecting the use of names consisting just
of slashes and spaces.

Furthermore, certain error cases in arfile.cc and extracttar.cc have
included member names in the output that were not checked at all and
might hence not be nul terminated, leading to further out of bound reads.

Fixes Debian/apt#111
LP: #1878177
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Allow aptitude to MarkInstall broken packages via FromUser</title>
<updated>2020-05-08T13:52:14Z</updated>
<author>
<name>David Kalnischkies</name>
<email>david@kalnischkies.de</email>
</author>
<published>2020-05-08T10:38:02Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/commit/?id=30fa50e8d593556553147478a2d5ea7a550f9e16'/>
<id>urn:sha1:30fa50e8d593556553147478a2d5ea7a550f9e16</id>
<content type='text'>
apt marks packages coming from the commandline among others
as protected to ensure the various resolver parts do not fiddle
with the state of these packages. aptitude (and potentially others)
do not so the state is modified (to a Keep which for uninstalled means
it is not going to be installed) due to being uninstallable before
the call fails – basically reverting at least some state changes the
call made before it realized it has to fail, which is usually a good
idea, except if users expect you to not do it.

They do set the FromUser option though which has beside controlling
autobit also gained the notion of "the user is always right" over time
and can be used for this one here as well preventing the state revert.

References: 0de399391372450d0162b5a09bfca554b2d27c3d
Reported-By: Jessica Clarke &lt;jrtc27@debian.org&gt; on IRC
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>apt list: Fix behavior of regex vs fnmatch vs wildcards</title>
<updated>2020-05-04T11:08:33Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Julian Andres Klode</name>
<email>julian.klode@canonical.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-05-04T11:08:33Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/commit/?id=c4f85bcb8bee1b5e647c7e629f616cffc7d12bbc'/>
<id>urn:sha1:c4f85bcb8bee1b5e647c7e629f616cffc7d12bbc</id>
<content type='text'>
Previously (and still in cacheset), patterns where only allowed to
start with ? or ~, which ignores the fact that a pattern might just
as well start with a negation, such a !~nfoo.

Also, we ignored the --regex flag if it looked like this, which
was somewhat bad.

Let's change this all:

* If --regex is given, arguments are always interpreted as regex
* If it is a valid package wildcard (name or * characters), then
  it will be interpreted as a wildcard - this set of characters is
  free from meaningful overlap with patterns.
* Otherwise, the argument is interpreted as a pattern.

For a future version, we need to adapt parsing for cacheset and
list to use a common parser, to avoid differences in their
interpretation. Likely, this code will go into the pattern parser,
such that it generates a pattern given a valid fnmatch argument
for example.
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Reinstate * wildcards</title>
<updated>2020-05-04T10:48:56Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Julian Andres Klode</name>
<email>julian.klode@canonical.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-05-04T10:23:50Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/commit/?id=75f59b16312523ab3deb995c48e8c8ae07586c23'/>
<id>urn:sha1:75f59b16312523ab3deb995c48e8c8ae07586c23</id>
<content type='text'>
Reinstate * wildcards as they are safe to use, but do not allow any
other special characters such as ? or [].

Notably, ? would overlap with patterns, and [] might overlap with
future pattern extensions (alternative bracketing style), it's also
hard to explain.

Closes: #953531
LP: #1872200
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Protect a package while resolving in MarkInstall</title>
<updated>2020-04-27T11:51:46Z</updated>
<author>
<name>David Kalnischkies</name>
<email>david@kalnischkies.de</email>
</author>
<published>2020-04-27T11:51:46Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/commit/?id=ae23e53f99ea0b7920744a7303fdee64796b7cce'/>
<id>urn:sha1:ae23e53f99ea0b7920744a7303fdee64796b7cce</id>
<content type='text'>
Strange things happen if while resolving the dependencies of a package
said dependencies want to remove the package. The allow-scores test e.g.
removed the preferred alternative in favor of the last one now that they
were exclusive. In our or-group for Recommends we would "just" not
statisfy the Recommends and for Depends we engage the ProblemResolver…
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Prefer upgrading installed orgroup members</title>
<updated>2020-04-27T11:49:43Z</updated>
<author>
<name>David Kalnischkies</name>
<email>david@kalnischkies.de</email>
</author>
<published>2020-04-26T19:09:14Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/commit/?id=ca14e1e2c3f3c9782f374757ca4605ce7e5670ad'/>
<id>urn:sha1:ca14e1e2c3f3c9782f374757ca4605ce7e5670ad</id>
<content type='text'>
In normal upgrade scenarios this is no problem as the orgroup member
will be marked for upgrade already, but on a not fully upgraded system
(or while you operate on a different target release) we would go with our
usual "first come first serve" approach which might lead us to install
another provider who comes earlier – bad if the providers conflict.
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Propagate Protected flag to single-option dependencies</title>
<updated>2020-04-27T11:49:19Z</updated>
<author>
<name>David Kalnischkies</name>
<email>david@kalnischkies.de</email>
</author>
<published>2020-04-27T11:49:19Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/commit/?id=f76a8d331a81bc7b102bdd4e0f8363e8a59f64f6'/>
<id>urn:sha1:f76a8d331a81bc7b102bdd4e0f8363e8a59f64f6</id>
<content type='text'>
If a package is protected and has a dependency satisfied only by a single
package (or conflicts with a package) this package must be part of the
solution and so we can help later actions not exploring dead ends by
propagating the protected flag to these "pseudo-protected" packages.

An (obscure) bug this can help prevent (to some extend) is shown in
test-apt-never-markauto-sections by not causing irreversible autobit
transfers.

As a sideeffect it seems also to help our crude ShowBroken to display
slightly more helpful messages involving the packages which are actually
in conflict.
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Discard candidate if its dependencies can't be satisfied</title>
<updated>2020-04-27T11:45:59Z</updated>
<author>
<name>David Kalnischkies</name>
<email>david@kalnischkies.de</email>
</author>
<published>2020-04-26T11:11:31Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/commit/?id=0de399391372450d0162b5a09bfca554b2d27c3d'/>
<id>urn:sha1:0de399391372450d0162b5a09bfca554b2d27c3d</id>
<content type='text'>
We do pretty much the same in IsInstallOk, but here we have already set
the state, so we have to unroll the state as well to sort-of replicate
the state we were in before this MarkInstall failed.
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Explore or-groups for Recommends further than first</title>
<updated>2020-04-27T11:44:24Z</updated>
<author>
<name>David Kalnischkies</name>
<email>david@kalnischkies.de</email>
</author>
<published>2020-04-25T09:28:47Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.kalnischkies.de/apt/commit/?id=ff4555c72df967e40590d9e8c6ce83e9df4c46ea'/>
<id>urn:sha1:ff4555c72df967e40590d9e8c6ce83e9df4c46ea</id>
<content type='text'>
MarkInstall only looks at the first alternative in an or-group which has
a fighting chance of being satisfiable (= the package itself satisfies
the dependency, if it is installable itself is not considered).

This is "hidden" for Depends by the problem resolver who will try
another member of the or-group later, but Recommends are not a problem
for it, so for them the alternatives are never further explored.

Exploring the or-group in MarkInstall seems like the better choice for
both types as that frees the problem resolver to deal with the hard
things like package conflicts.
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
