diff options
author | Arch Librarian <arch@canonical.com> | 2004-09-20 17:03:51 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Arch Librarian <arch@canonical.com> | 2004-09-20 17:03:51 +0000 |
commit | 58d768314ed24fa53f1559a4c323e70c56aad6dd (patch) | |
tree | 209245e5d5db85d86c344236ccbccad91cb68def | |
parent | 06fc4dafb464a5905a7cdc3add72524d5fcd0cfa (diff) |
* apt-get build-dep, when trying to skip over the remai...
Author: mdz
Date: 2003-09-24 04:00:25 GMT
* apt-get build-dep, when trying to skip over the remaining elements of
an or-expression, would accidentally inherit the version requirements of a
later item in the or-expression. Fixed it.
* Let apt-get build-dep try alternatives if the first dependency in an
or-expression is not available
* Add a Debug::BuildDeps to generate some trace output
* Help apt-get build-dep produce more useful error messages
* Process build-dependencies in forward rather than reverse order
* Error out if an installed package is too new for a << or <=
build-dependency
-rw-r--r-- | cmdline/apt-get.cc | 120 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | debian/changelog | 20 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | po/apt-all.pot | 32 |
3 files changed, 131 insertions, 41 deletions
diff --git a/cmdline/apt-get.cc b/cmdline/apt-get.cc index 72d674dea..0cf723466 100644 --- a/cmdline/apt-get.cc +++ b/cmdline/apt-get.cc @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ // -*- mode: cpp; mode: fold -*- // Description /*{{{*/ -// $Id: apt-get.cc,v 1.142 2003/09/19 03:10:01 mdz Exp $ +// $Id: apt-get.cc,v 1.143 2003/09/24 04:00:25 mdz Exp $ /* ###################################################################### apt-get - Cover for dpkg @@ -2053,7 +2053,7 @@ bool DoBuildDep(CommandLine &CmdL) rec.Package = Opts->Value; rec.Type = pkgSrcRecords::Parser::BuildDependIndep; rec.Op = 0; - BuildDeps.insert(BuildDeps.begin(), rec); + BuildDeps.push_back(rec); } if (BuildDeps.size() == 0) @@ -2066,8 +2066,18 @@ bool DoBuildDep(CommandLine &CmdL) unsigned int ExpectedInst = 0; vector <pkgSrcRecords::Parser::BuildDepRec>::iterator D; pkgProblemResolver Fix(Cache); + bool skipAlternatives = false; // skip remaining alternatives in an or group for (D = BuildDeps.begin(); D != BuildDeps.end(); D++) { + bool hasAlternatives = (((*D).Op & pkgCache::Dep::Or) == pkgCache::Dep::Or); + + if (skipAlternatives == true) + { + if (!hasAlternatives) + skipAlternatives = false; // end of or group + continue; + } + if ((*D).Type == pkgSrcRecords::Parser::BuildConflict || (*D).Type == pkgSrcRecords::Parser::BuildConflictIndep) { @@ -2089,16 +2099,21 @@ bool DoBuildDep(CommandLine &CmdL) else // BuildDep || BuildDepIndep { pkgCache::PkgIterator Pkg = Cache->FindPkg((*D).Package); + if (_config->FindB("Debug::BuildDeps",false) == true) + cout << "Looking for " << (*D).Package << "...\n"; + if (Pkg.end() == true) { - // Check if there are any alternatives - if (((*D).Op & pkgCache::Dep::Or) != pkgCache::Dep::Or) - return _error->Error(_("%s dependency for %s cannot be satisfied " - "because the package %s cannot be found"), - Last->BuildDepType((*D).Type),Src.c_str(), - (*D).Package.c_str()); - // Try the next alternative - continue; + if (_config->FindB("Debug::BuildDeps",false) == true) + cout << " (not found)" << (*D).Package << endl; + + if (hasAlternatives) + continue; + + return _error->Error(_("%s dependency for %s cannot be satisfied " + "because the package %s cannot be found"), + Last->BuildDepType((*D).Type),Src.c_str(), + (*D).Package.c_str()); } /* @@ -2111,9 +2126,6 @@ bool DoBuildDep(CommandLine &CmdL) * this would require we do a Resolve cycle for each package we * add to the install list. Ugh */ - while (D != BuildDeps.end() && - (((*D).Op & pkgCache::Dep::Or) == pkgCache::Dep::Or)) - D++; /* * If this is a virtual package, we need to check the list of @@ -2121,9 +2133,11 @@ bool DoBuildDep(CommandLine &CmdL) * installed */ pkgCache::PrvIterator Prv = Pkg.ProvidesList(); - bool providedBySomething = !Prv.end(); for (; Prv.end() != true; Prv++) { + if (_config->FindB("Debug::BuildDeps",false) == true) + cout << " Checking provider " << Prv.OwnerPkg().Name() << endl; + if ((*Cache)[Prv.OwnerPkg()].InstVerIter(*Cache).end() == false) break; } @@ -2131,9 +2145,8 @@ bool DoBuildDep(CommandLine &CmdL) // Get installed version and version we are going to install pkgCache::VerIterator IV = (*Cache)[Pkg].InstVerIter(*Cache); - if (!providedBySomething || (*D).Version[0] != '\0') { - /* We either have a versioned dependency (so a provides won't do) - or nothing is providing this package */ + if ((*D).Version[0] != '\0') { + // Versioned dependency pkgCache::VerIterator CV = (*Cache)[Pkg].CandidateVerIter(*Cache); @@ -2149,19 +2162,64 @@ bool DoBuildDep(CommandLine &CmdL) Last->BuildDepType((*D).Type),Src.c_str(), (*D).Package.c_str()); } + else + { + // Only consider virtual packages if there is no versioned dependency + if (Prv.end() == false) + { + if (_config->FindB("Debug::BuildDeps",false) == true) + cout << " Is provided by installed package " << Prv.OwnerPkg().Name() << endl; + skipAlternatives = hasAlternatives; + continue; + } + } - /* - * TODO: if we depend on a version lower than what we already have - * installed it is not clear what should be done; in practice - * this case should be rare, and right now nothing is - * done about it :-( - */ - if (Prv.end() == true && // Nothing provides it; and - (IV.end() == true || // It is not installed, or - Cache->VS().CheckDep(IV.VerStr(),(*D).Op,(*D).Version.c_str()) == false)) - // the version installed doesn't - // satisfy constraints - TryToInstall(Pkg,Cache,Fix,false,false,ExpectedInst); + if (IV.end() == false) + { + if (_config->FindB("Debug::BuildDeps",false) == true) + cout << " Is installed\n"; + + if (Cache->VS().CheckDep(IV.VerStr(),(*D).Op,(*D).Version.c_str()) == true) + { + skipAlternatives = hasAlternatives; + continue; + } + + if (_config->FindB("Debug::BuildDeps",false) == true) + cout << " ...but the installed version doesn't meet the version requirement\n"; + + if (((*D).Op & pkgCache::Dep::LessEq) == pkgCache::Dep::LessEq) + { + return _error->Error(_("Failed to satisfy %s dependency for %s: Installed package %s is too new"), + Last->BuildDepType((*D).Type), + Src.c_str(), + Pkg.Name()); + } + } + + + if (_config->FindB("Debug::BuildDeps",false) == true) + cout << " Trying to install " << (*D).Package << endl; + + if (TryToInstall(Pkg,Cache,Fix,false,false,ExpectedInst) == true) + { + // We successfully installed something; skip remaining alternatives + skipAlternatives = hasAlternatives; + continue; + } + else if (hasAlternatives) + { + if (_config->FindB("Debug::BuildDeps",false) == true) + cout << " Unsatisfiable, trying alternatives\n"; + continue; + } + else + { + return _error->Error(_("Failed to satisfy %s dependency for %s: %s"), + Last->BuildDepType((*D).Type), + Src.c_str(), + (*D).Package.c_str()); + } } } @@ -2171,8 +2229,8 @@ bool DoBuildDep(CommandLine &CmdL) // Now we check the state of the packages, if (Cache->BrokenCount() != 0) - return _error->Error(_("Some broken packages were found while trying to process build-dependencies.\n" - "You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these.")); + return _error->Error(_("Some broken packages were found while trying to process build-dependencies for %s.\n" + "You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these."),*I); } if (InstallPackages(Cache, false, true) == false) diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 596458214..f7d1fbe97 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,23 @@ +apt (0.5.14) unstable; urgency=low + + * apt-get build-dep, when trying to skip over the remaining elements of + an or-expression, would accidentally inherit the version requirements of a + later item in the or-expression. Fixed it. + * Let apt-get build-dep try alternatives if the first dependency in an + or-expression is not available + * Add a Debug::BuildDeps to generate some trace output + * Help apt-get build-dep produce more useful error messages + * Process build-dependencies in forward rather than reverse order + * Error out if an installed package is too new for a << or <= + build-dependency + * apt-get build-dep should now be able to handle almost any package with + correct build-depends. The primary exception is build-dependencies on + virtual packages with more than one provider, and these are + discouraged for automated processing (but still common, + unfortunately). + + -- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> Tue, 23 Sep 2003 22:57:31 -0400 + apt (0.5.13) unstable; urgency=medium * Document configuration file comment syntax in apt.conf(5) diff --git a/po/apt-all.pot b/po/apt-all.pot index 03cbdf202..5b6c78a6a 100644 --- a/po/apt-all.pot +++ b/po/apt-all.pot @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ msgid "" msgstr "" "Project-Id-Version: PACKAGE VERSION\n" "Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n" -"POT-Creation-Date: 2003-09-10 15:26-0400\n" +"POT-Creation-Date: 2003-09-23 23:59-0400\n" "PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n" "Last-Translator: FULL NAME <EMAIL@ADDRESS>\n" "Language-Team: LANGUAGE <LL@li.org>\n" @@ -146,9 +146,9 @@ msgstr "" msgid " %4i %s\n" msgstr "" -#: cmdline/apt-cache.cc:1581 cmdline/apt-cdrom.cc:730 cmdline/apt-config.cc:70 +#: cmdline/apt-cache.cc:1581 cmdline/apt-cdrom.cc:731 cmdline/apt-config.cc:70 #: cmdline/apt-extracttemplates.cc:225 ftparchive/apt-ftparchive.cc:544 -#: cmdline/apt-get.cc:2206 cmdline/apt-sortpkgs.cc:144 +#: cmdline/apt-get.cc:2264 cmdline/apt-sortpkgs.cc:144 #, c-format msgid "%s %s for %s %s compiled on %s %s\n" msgstr "" @@ -958,35 +958,47 @@ msgstr "" msgid "%s has no build depends.\n" msgstr "" -#: cmdline/apt-get.cc:2096 +#: cmdline/apt-get.cc:2113 #, c-format msgid "" "%s dependency for %s cannot be satisfied because the package %s cannot be " "found" msgstr "" -#: cmdline/apt-get.cc:2146 +#: cmdline/apt-get.cc:2159 #, c-format msgid "" "%s dependency for %s cannot be satisfied because no available versions of " "package %s can satisfy version requirements" msgstr "" -#: cmdline/apt-get.cc:2174 +#: cmdline/apt-get.cc:2193 +#, c-format +msgid "Failed to satisfy %s dependency for %s: Installed package %s is too new" +msgstr "" + +#: cmdline/apt-get.cc:2218 +#, c-format +msgid "Failed to satisfy %s dependency for %s: %s" +msgstr "" + +#: cmdline/apt-get.cc:2232 +#, c-format msgid "" -"Some broken packages were found while trying to process build-dependencies.\n" +"Some broken packages were found while trying to process build-dependencies " +"for %s.\n" "You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these." msgstr "" -#: cmdline/apt-get.cc:2179 +#: cmdline/apt-get.cc:2237 msgid "Failed to process build dependencies" msgstr "" -#: cmdline/apt-get.cc:2211 +#: cmdline/apt-get.cc:2269 msgid "Supported Modules:" msgstr "" -#: cmdline/apt-get.cc:2252 +#: cmdline/apt-get.cc:2310 msgid "" "Usage: apt-get [options] command\n" " apt-get [options] install|remove pkg1 [pkg2 ...]\n" |