summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorArch Librarian <arch@canonical.com>2004-09-20 17:03:51 +0000
committerArch Librarian <arch@canonical.com>2004-09-20 17:03:51 +0000
commit58d768314ed24fa53f1559a4c323e70c56aad6dd (patch)
tree209245e5d5db85d86c344236ccbccad91cb68def
parent06fc4dafb464a5905a7cdc3add72524d5fcd0cfa (diff)
* apt-get build-dep, when trying to skip over the remai...
Author: mdz Date: 2003-09-24 04:00:25 GMT * apt-get build-dep, when trying to skip over the remaining elements of an or-expression, would accidentally inherit the version requirements of a later item in the or-expression. Fixed it. * Let apt-get build-dep try alternatives if the first dependency in an or-expression is not available * Add a Debug::BuildDeps to generate some trace output * Help apt-get build-dep produce more useful error messages * Process build-dependencies in forward rather than reverse order * Error out if an installed package is too new for a << or <= build-dependency
-rw-r--r--cmdline/apt-get.cc120
-rw-r--r--debian/changelog20
-rw-r--r--po/apt-all.pot32
3 files changed, 131 insertions, 41 deletions
diff --git a/cmdline/apt-get.cc b/cmdline/apt-get.cc
index 72d674dea..0cf723466 100644
--- a/cmdline/apt-get.cc
+++ b/cmdline/apt-get.cc
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
// -*- mode: cpp; mode: fold -*-
// Description /*{{{*/
-// $Id: apt-get.cc,v 1.142 2003/09/19 03:10:01 mdz Exp $
+// $Id: apt-get.cc,v 1.143 2003/09/24 04:00:25 mdz Exp $
/* ######################################################################
apt-get - Cover for dpkg
@@ -2053,7 +2053,7 @@ bool DoBuildDep(CommandLine &CmdL)
rec.Package = Opts->Value;
rec.Type = pkgSrcRecords::Parser::BuildDependIndep;
rec.Op = 0;
- BuildDeps.insert(BuildDeps.begin(), rec);
+ BuildDeps.push_back(rec);
}
if (BuildDeps.size() == 0)
@@ -2066,8 +2066,18 @@ bool DoBuildDep(CommandLine &CmdL)
unsigned int ExpectedInst = 0;
vector <pkgSrcRecords::Parser::BuildDepRec>::iterator D;
pkgProblemResolver Fix(Cache);
+ bool skipAlternatives = false; // skip remaining alternatives in an or group
for (D = BuildDeps.begin(); D != BuildDeps.end(); D++)
{
+ bool hasAlternatives = (((*D).Op & pkgCache::Dep::Or) == pkgCache::Dep::Or);
+
+ if (skipAlternatives == true)
+ {
+ if (!hasAlternatives)
+ skipAlternatives = false; // end of or group
+ continue;
+ }
+
if ((*D).Type == pkgSrcRecords::Parser::BuildConflict ||
(*D).Type == pkgSrcRecords::Parser::BuildConflictIndep)
{
@@ -2089,16 +2099,21 @@ bool DoBuildDep(CommandLine &CmdL)
else // BuildDep || BuildDepIndep
{
pkgCache::PkgIterator Pkg = Cache->FindPkg((*D).Package);
+ if (_config->FindB("Debug::BuildDeps",false) == true)
+ cout << "Looking for " << (*D).Package << "...\n";
+
if (Pkg.end() == true)
{
- // Check if there are any alternatives
- if (((*D).Op & pkgCache::Dep::Or) != pkgCache::Dep::Or)
- return _error->Error(_("%s dependency for %s cannot be satisfied "
- "because the package %s cannot be found"),
- Last->BuildDepType((*D).Type),Src.c_str(),
- (*D).Package.c_str());
- // Try the next alternative
- continue;
+ if (_config->FindB("Debug::BuildDeps",false) == true)
+ cout << " (not found)" << (*D).Package << endl;
+
+ if (hasAlternatives)
+ continue;
+
+ return _error->Error(_("%s dependency for %s cannot be satisfied "
+ "because the package %s cannot be found"),
+ Last->BuildDepType((*D).Type),Src.c_str(),
+ (*D).Package.c_str());
}
/*
@@ -2111,9 +2126,6 @@ bool DoBuildDep(CommandLine &CmdL)
* this would require we do a Resolve cycle for each package we
* add to the install list. Ugh
*/
- while (D != BuildDeps.end() &&
- (((*D).Op & pkgCache::Dep::Or) == pkgCache::Dep::Or))
- D++;
/*
* If this is a virtual package, we need to check the list of
@@ -2121,9 +2133,11 @@ bool DoBuildDep(CommandLine &CmdL)
* installed
*/
pkgCache::PrvIterator Prv = Pkg.ProvidesList();
- bool providedBySomething = !Prv.end();
for (; Prv.end() != true; Prv++)
{
+ if (_config->FindB("Debug::BuildDeps",false) == true)
+ cout << " Checking provider " << Prv.OwnerPkg().Name() << endl;
+
if ((*Cache)[Prv.OwnerPkg()].InstVerIter(*Cache).end() == false)
break;
}
@@ -2131,9 +2145,8 @@ bool DoBuildDep(CommandLine &CmdL)
// Get installed version and version we are going to install
pkgCache::VerIterator IV = (*Cache)[Pkg].InstVerIter(*Cache);
- if (!providedBySomething || (*D).Version[0] != '\0') {
- /* We either have a versioned dependency (so a provides won't do)
- or nothing is providing this package */
+ if ((*D).Version[0] != '\0') {
+ // Versioned dependency
pkgCache::VerIterator CV = (*Cache)[Pkg].CandidateVerIter(*Cache);
@@ -2149,19 +2162,64 @@ bool DoBuildDep(CommandLine &CmdL)
Last->BuildDepType((*D).Type),Src.c_str(),
(*D).Package.c_str());
}
+ else
+ {
+ // Only consider virtual packages if there is no versioned dependency
+ if (Prv.end() == false)
+ {
+ if (_config->FindB("Debug::BuildDeps",false) == true)
+ cout << " Is provided by installed package " << Prv.OwnerPkg().Name() << endl;
+ skipAlternatives = hasAlternatives;
+ continue;
+ }
+ }
- /*
- * TODO: if we depend on a version lower than what we already have
- * installed it is not clear what should be done; in practice
- * this case should be rare, and right now nothing is
- * done about it :-(
- */
- if (Prv.end() == true && // Nothing provides it; and
- (IV.end() == true || // It is not installed, or
- Cache->VS().CheckDep(IV.VerStr(),(*D).Op,(*D).Version.c_str()) == false))
- // the version installed doesn't
- // satisfy constraints
- TryToInstall(Pkg,Cache,Fix,false,false,ExpectedInst);
+ if (IV.end() == false)
+ {
+ if (_config->FindB("Debug::BuildDeps",false) == true)
+ cout << " Is installed\n";
+
+ if (Cache->VS().CheckDep(IV.VerStr(),(*D).Op,(*D).Version.c_str()) == true)
+ {
+ skipAlternatives = hasAlternatives;
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ if (_config->FindB("Debug::BuildDeps",false) == true)
+ cout << " ...but the installed version doesn't meet the version requirement\n";
+
+ if (((*D).Op & pkgCache::Dep::LessEq) == pkgCache::Dep::LessEq)
+ {
+ return _error->Error(_("Failed to satisfy %s dependency for %s: Installed package %s is too new"),
+ Last->BuildDepType((*D).Type),
+ Src.c_str(),
+ Pkg.Name());
+ }
+ }
+
+
+ if (_config->FindB("Debug::BuildDeps",false) == true)
+ cout << " Trying to install " << (*D).Package << endl;
+
+ if (TryToInstall(Pkg,Cache,Fix,false,false,ExpectedInst) == true)
+ {
+ // We successfully installed something; skip remaining alternatives
+ skipAlternatives = hasAlternatives;
+ continue;
+ }
+ else if (hasAlternatives)
+ {
+ if (_config->FindB("Debug::BuildDeps",false) == true)
+ cout << " Unsatisfiable, trying alternatives\n";
+ continue;
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ return _error->Error(_("Failed to satisfy %s dependency for %s: %s"),
+ Last->BuildDepType((*D).Type),
+ Src.c_str(),
+ (*D).Package.c_str());
+ }
}
}
@@ -2171,8 +2229,8 @@ bool DoBuildDep(CommandLine &CmdL)
// Now we check the state of the packages,
if (Cache->BrokenCount() != 0)
- return _error->Error(_("Some broken packages were found while trying to process build-dependencies.\n"
- "You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these."));
+ return _error->Error(_("Some broken packages were found while trying to process build-dependencies for %s.\n"
+ "You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these."),*I);
}
if (InstallPackages(Cache, false, true) == false)
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 596458214..f7d1fbe97 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,23 @@
+apt (0.5.14) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * apt-get build-dep, when trying to skip over the remaining elements of
+ an or-expression, would accidentally inherit the version requirements of a
+ later item in the or-expression. Fixed it.
+ * Let apt-get build-dep try alternatives if the first dependency in an
+ or-expression is not available
+ * Add a Debug::BuildDeps to generate some trace output
+ * Help apt-get build-dep produce more useful error messages
+ * Process build-dependencies in forward rather than reverse order
+ * Error out if an installed package is too new for a << or <=
+ build-dependency
+ * apt-get build-dep should now be able to handle almost any package with
+ correct build-depends. The primary exception is build-dependencies on
+ virtual packages with more than one provider, and these are
+ discouraged for automated processing (but still common,
+ unfortunately).
+
+ -- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> Tue, 23 Sep 2003 22:57:31 -0400
+
apt (0.5.13) unstable; urgency=medium
* Document configuration file comment syntax in apt.conf(5)
diff --git a/po/apt-all.pot b/po/apt-all.pot
index 03cbdf202..5b6c78a6a 100644
--- a/po/apt-all.pot
+++ b/po/apt-all.pot
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: PACKAGE VERSION\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2003-09-10 15:26-0400\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2003-09-23 23:59-0400\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n"
"Last-Translator: FULL NAME <EMAIL@ADDRESS>\n"
"Language-Team: LANGUAGE <LL@li.org>\n"
@@ -146,9 +146,9 @@ msgstr ""
msgid " %4i %s\n"
msgstr ""
-#: cmdline/apt-cache.cc:1581 cmdline/apt-cdrom.cc:730 cmdline/apt-config.cc:70
+#: cmdline/apt-cache.cc:1581 cmdline/apt-cdrom.cc:731 cmdline/apt-config.cc:70
#: cmdline/apt-extracttemplates.cc:225 ftparchive/apt-ftparchive.cc:544
-#: cmdline/apt-get.cc:2206 cmdline/apt-sortpkgs.cc:144
+#: cmdline/apt-get.cc:2264 cmdline/apt-sortpkgs.cc:144
#, c-format
msgid "%s %s for %s %s compiled on %s %s\n"
msgstr ""
@@ -958,35 +958,47 @@ msgstr ""
msgid "%s has no build depends.\n"
msgstr ""
-#: cmdline/apt-get.cc:2096
+#: cmdline/apt-get.cc:2113
#, c-format
msgid ""
"%s dependency for %s cannot be satisfied because the package %s cannot be "
"found"
msgstr ""
-#: cmdline/apt-get.cc:2146
+#: cmdline/apt-get.cc:2159
#, c-format
msgid ""
"%s dependency for %s cannot be satisfied because no available versions of "
"package %s can satisfy version requirements"
msgstr ""
-#: cmdline/apt-get.cc:2174
+#: cmdline/apt-get.cc:2193
+#, c-format
+msgid "Failed to satisfy %s dependency for %s: Installed package %s is too new"
+msgstr ""
+
+#: cmdline/apt-get.cc:2218
+#, c-format
+msgid "Failed to satisfy %s dependency for %s: %s"
+msgstr ""
+
+#: cmdline/apt-get.cc:2232
+#, c-format
msgid ""
-"Some broken packages were found while trying to process build-dependencies.\n"
+"Some broken packages were found while trying to process build-dependencies "
+"for %s.\n"
"You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these."
msgstr ""
-#: cmdline/apt-get.cc:2179
+#: cmdline/apt-get.cc:2237
msgid "Failed to process build dependencies"
msgstr ""
-#: cmdline/apt-get.cc:2211
+#: cmdline/apt-get.cc:2269
msgid "Supported Modules:"
msgstr ""
-#: cmdline/apt-get.cc:2252
+#: cmdline/apt-get.cc:2310
msgid ""
"Usage: apt-get [options] command\n"
" apt-get [options] install|remove pkg1 [pkg2 ...]\n"