| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Main-process-side implementation of retry back-off
See merge request apt-team/apt!181
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This delay of 4+2+1=7 seconds in unnecessary.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This is subject to clock skew, unfortunately, as we cannot read
monotonic time in shell.
We check for >=5s out of the 7s it should take to reduce the
risk of skew a bit.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This is very basic support on the testing side, we just test
the debug output but not how long it actually took. Would be
nice to check time really.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Fix the typo, and use the helper function to convert it, so we
do not end up with 5 seconds encoded as 0s and 5*10^6 microseconds.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This yields more accurate delays and avoids issues with clock
skew.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
If there is an item with fetchAfter at the top of a queue,
reduce sleep() timeout so we can detect it and start it,
by calling Cycle() on the queue in the next iteration.
For some reasons we have to call select() with a 0s timeout
if we just marked an item as ready. Oh well.
Previous versions of this patch only called global Bump() after a timeout
from select(); this was unfortunately incorrect - it meant that we
never bumped a queue that did not start yet while other queues were
running, potentially significantly delaying retries.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Add a new Item field called FetchAfter, which determines the earliest
time the item should be fetched at. Adjust insertion into queue to
take it into account alongside priority, and only fill pipelines
with items that are ready.
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Enqueuing by calling Init(), and then resetting the status to
idle means that the item can get enqueued twice if we call
Cycle() from inside pkgAcquire::Run().
Reset the status to StatIdle before calling Init()
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Restore dpkg::chroot-directory functionality
See merge request apt-team/apt!178
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
If we call dpkg inside a chroot we have to ensure that the temporary
directory we construct to call dpkg --recursive is inside the chroot and
that we strip the path to the chroot from the directory name we pass to
dpkg.
Note that the added test succeeds before and (hopefully) after as we
can't really chroot here or fiddle with the needed settings as we are
already setting up apt to work with a quasi-chroot. The test perhaps
helps in ensuring we don't break it too much in the future though.
(Broken five years (and one day) ago this seems to have an immense user
base at the moment, but it might in the future via mmdebstrap)
References: f495992428a396e0f98886c9a761a804aa161c68
Reported-By: Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues on IRC
Tested-By: Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Allow packages from volatile sources to be reinstalled
See merge request apt-team/apt!177
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Just because two packages have the same version number doesn't mean it is
the same package. APT can detect rebuilds and other "inconsistencies",
but we had no explicit test for it so far. It turned out to be the wrong
track in this branch, but as I wrote it already, lets add it at least.
Gbp-Dch: Ignore
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Temporary hacks should be temporary, especially if they hide bugs. After
fixing one in the previous commit this is just busy work to add download
information to the places which check that output.
Gbp-Dch: Ignore
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Volatile sources are parsed after the status file, so if we have a
version already installed the size information is not stored, so that
a reinstall of said version is refused claiming a broken repository.
References: 1412cf51403286e9c040f9f86fd4d8306e62aff2
|
| |/
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The error says the repository is broken but doesn't mention which one it
is. The item description gives us at least all the information, but is
not as nicely formatted. As this message is not even marked for
translation this is a rather temporary affair and we can survive without
the eye candy for a while.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
We just used the pointer returned which might be nullptr, properly
call BuildSourceList() and check the result first.
Closes: #990518
|
|/
|
|
| |
LP: #1309658
|
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
URI encode filename fields (again)
See merge request apt-team/apt!175
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The code exists since ever, but no other client supports this and the
specification like debian-policy isn't asking for this either. What it
does do is breaking than all others continue working through: If the
filename includes in fact URI encoded bits (hopefully no quotes) which
is rather unlikely, but none the less possible.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
If a source is not copying files to the destination the download code
forces the copy – which in practice are local repositories accessed
via file:/ – but in that process takes the filename the local repo used
rather than the filename it e.g. advertised via --print-uris.
A local repository could hence override a file in the current directory
if you use 'apt download', which is a rather weak ability, but still.
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Keeping URIs encoded in the acquire system depends on having them
encoded in the first place. While many other places got the encoding
2 out of 3 ArchiveURI implementations were missed which are in practice
responsible for nearly all of the URI building, just that index filename
do not contain characters to escape and the Filename fields in Packages
files usually aren't. Usually. Except if you happen to have e.g. an epoch
featuring package with the colon encoded in the filename. On the upside,
in most repositories the epoch isn't part of the filename.
Reported-By: Johannes 'josch' Schauer on IRC
References: e6c55283d235aa9404395d30f2db891f36995c49
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If a package is not installed yet, we do need to apply
phasing as we otherwise get into weird situations when
installing packages:
In the launchpad bug below, ubuntu-release-upgrader-core
was installed, and hence the phasing for the upgrade to it
was applied. However, ubuntu-release-upgrader-gtk was about
to be installed - and hence the phasing did not apply, causing
a version mismatch, because ubuntu-release-upgrader-gtk from
-updates was used, but -core from release pocket. Sigh.
An alternative approach to dealing with this issue could be to
apply phasing to all packages within the same source package,
which would work in most cases. However, there might be unforeseen
side effects and it is of course possible to have = depends between
source packages, such as -signed packages on the unsigned ones for
bootloaders.
This problem does not occur in the update-manager implementation
of phased updates as update-manager only deals with upgrading packages,
but does not install new packages and thus does not see that issue. APT
however, has to apply phasing more broadly, as you can and often do
install additional packages during upgrade, or upgrade packages during
install commands, as both accept package list arguments and have the
same code in the backend.
LP: #1925745
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This makes them retriable, and brings them more into line with
TCP, where handshake is also a transient error.
LP: #1928100
|
|\
| |
| |
| | |
See https://github.com/Debian/apt/pull/129
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Some C libraries e.g. musl do not implement the new res_n* APIs
therefore keep the old implementation as fallback and check __RES
version macro to determine the API level
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Cc: Julian Andres Klode <julian.klode@canonical.com>
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This reverts commit 64127478630b676838735b509fec5cdfa36874c8.
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Fix a typo in json-hooks-protocol.md
See merge request apt-team/apt!173
|
| | | |
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Count uninstallable packages in "not upgraded"
See merge request apt-team/apt!169
|
| |/ /
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
If a first step of the solver can figure out that a package is
uninstallable it might reset the candidate so that later steps are
prevented from exploring this dead end. While that helps the resolver it
can confuse the display of the found solution as this will include an
incorrect count of packages not upgraded in this solution.
It was possible before, but happens a fair bit more with the April/May
resolver changes last year so finally doing proper counting is a good
idea.
Sadly this is a bit harder than just getting the number first and than
subtracting the packages we upgraded from it as the user can influence
candidates via the command line and a package which could be upgraded,
but is removed instead shouldn't count as not upgraded as we clearly did
something with it. So we keep a list of packages instead of a number
which also help in the upgrade cmds as those want to show the list.
Closes: #981535
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Mark only provides from protected versioned kernel packages
See merge request apt-team/apt!168
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
They are kinda costly, so it makes more sense to keep them around in
private storage rather than generate them all the time in the
MarkPackage method. We do keep them lazy through as we have that
implemented already.
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
An interactive tool like aptitude needs these flags current far more
often than we do as a user can see them in apt only in one very well
defined place – the autoremove display block – so we don't need to run
it up to four times while a normal "apt install" is processed as that is
just busywork.
The effect on runtime is minimal, as a single run doesn't take too long
anyhow, but it cuts down tremendously on debug output at the expense of
requiring some manual handholding.
This is opt-in so that aptitude doesn't need to change nor do we need to
change our own tools like "apt list" where it is working correctly as
intended.
A special flag and co is needed as we want to prevent the ActionGroup
inside pkgDepCache::Init to be inhibited already so we need to insert
ourselves while the DepCache is still in the process of being built.
This is also the reason why the debug output in some tests changed to
all unmarked, but that is fine as the marking could have been already
obsoleted by the actions taken, just inhibited by a proper action group.
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
The autoremove algorithm would mark a package previously after exploring
it once, but it could have been that it ignored some providers due to
them not satisfying the (versioned) dependency. A later dependency which
they might satisfy would encounter the package as already marked and
hence doesn't explore the providers anymore leaving us with internal
errors (as in the contrived new testcase).
This is resolved by introducing a new flag denoting if we explored every
provider already and only skip exploring if that is true, which sounds
bad but is really not such a common occurrence that it seems noticeable
in practice. It also helps us marking virtual packages as explored now
which would previously be tried each time they are encountered mostly
hiding this problem for the (far more common) fully virtual package.
|
| |/ /
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
An out-of-tree kernel module which doesn't see many new versions can
pile up a considerable amount of packages if it is depended on via
another packages (e.g.: v4l2loopback-utils recommends v4l2loopback-modules)
which in turn can prevent the old kernels from being removed if they
happen to have a dependency on the images.
To prevent this we check if a provider is a versioned kernel package
(like an out-of-tree module) and if so check if that module package is
part of the protected kernel set – if not it is probably good to go.
We only do this if at least one provider is from a protected kernel
though so that the dependency remains satisfied (this can happen e.g. if
the module is currently not buildable against a protected kernel).
|
|\ \ \
| |/ /
|/| |
| | |
| | | |
Allow superfluous commas in build-dependency lines
See merge request apt-team/apt!167
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
This code can interact with handwritten files who can have unneeded
commas for writing easy. As dpkg allows it, we should do as well.
Reported-By: Arnaud Ferraris <arnaud.ferraris@gmail.com>
References: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/03/msg00101.html
|
|/ /
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The comment and code are a bit too roundabout about what they actually
try to do, so lets just set that straight as this is really just about a
very specific case and doesn't deserve a general resetting.
Gbp-Dch: Ignore
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Gbp-Dch: ignore
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
dpkg 1.20.8 also made --force-remove-essential optional for
deconfiguring essential packages, so let's do this.
Also extend the test case to make sure we actuall pass
auto-deconfigure and do not make any --remove calls, or
pass --force-remove to dpkg.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Ugh, this was super flaky under -j 16 and -j 4, each behaving
in slightly different ways. This seems to be stable now. No
real bug though, all behaviors were OK.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The code missed a break, so it was looping infinitely because
the while loop condition only checked for '\n' and '\r', but not
end of file.
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
JSON Hooks 0.2
See merge request apt-team/apt!166
|