| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RFC7233 3.2 If-Range specifies the comparison to be an exact match,
not a less or equal, which makes no sense in this context anyhow.
Our server exists only to write our tests against it so this isn't much
of a practical issue. I did confirm with a crashing server that no test
(silently) depends on this or exhibits a different behaviour not
explicitly checked for.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Debian buster (oldstable) ships 6.1 while bullseye (stable) ships 6.5
and so the later is 'fixed'. Upstream declares 6.0 still as supported.
It might be still a while we encounter "bad" versions in the wild, so
if we can detect and work around the issue at runtime automatically we
can save some users from running into "persistent" partial files.
References: https://varnish-cache.org/docs/6.4/whats-new/changes-6.4.html#changes-in-behavior
|
|
|
apt makes heavy usage of HTTP1.1 features including Range and If-Range.
Sadly it is not obvious if the involved server(s) (and proxies) actually
support them all. The Acquire::http::AllowRange option defaults to true
as before, but now a user can disable Range usage if it is known that
the involved server is not dealing with such requests correctly.
|
