summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/integration/test-multiarch-allowed
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Recognize propagated protected in pkgProblemResolverDavid Kalnischkies2020-05-181-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Turns out that pkgDepCache and pkgProblemResolver maintain two (semi) independent sets of protected flags – except that a package if marked protected in the pkgProblemResolver is automatically also marked in the pkgDepCache as protected. This way the pkgProblemResolver will have as protected only the direct user requests while pkgDepCache will (hopefully) propagate the flag to unavoidable dependencies of these requests nowadays. The pkgProblemResolver was only checking his own protected flag though and based on that calls our Mark* methods usually without checking return, leading to it believing it could e.g. remove packages it actually can't remove as pkgDepCache will not allow it as it is marked as protected there. Teaching it to check for the flag in the pkgDepCache instead avoids it believing in the wrong things eventually giving up. The scoring is keeping the behaviour of adding the large score boost only for the direct user requests though as there is no telling which other sideeffects this might have if too many packages get too many points from the get-go. Second part of fixing #960705, now with pkgProblemResolver output which looks more like the whole class of problem is resolved rather than a teeny tiny edgecase it was before.
* Keep going if a dep is bad for user requests to improve errorsDavid Kalnischkies2020-05-181-1/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | We exit early from installing dependencies of a package only if it is not a user request to avoid polluting the state with installs which might not be needed (or detrimental even) for alternative choices. We do continue with installing dependencies though if it is a user request as it will improve error reporting for apt and can even help aptitude not hang itself so much as we trim the problem space down for its resolver dealing with all the easy things. Similar things can be said about the testcase I have short-circuit previously… keep going test, do what you should do to report errors!
* Propagate Protected flag to single-option dependenciesDavid Kalnischkies2020-04-271-4/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If a package is protected and has a dependency satisfied only by a single package (or conflicts with a package) this package must be part of the solution and so we can help later actions not exploring dead ends by propagating the protected flag to these "pseudo-protected" packages. An (obscure) bug this can help prevent (to some extend) is shown in test-apt-never-markauto-sections by not causing irreversible autobit transfers. As a sideeffect it seems also to help our crude ShowBroken to display slightly more helpful messages involving the packages which are actually in conflict.
* fix M-A:foreign provides creation for unknown archsDavid Kalnischkies2016-01-141-1/+3
| | | | | | | | Architectures for packages which do not belong to the native nor a foreign architecture (dubbed barbarian for now) which are marked M-A:foreign still provide in their own architecture even if not for others. Also, other M-A:foreign (and allowed) packages provide in these barbarian architectures.
* tests: support spaces in path and TMPDIRDavid Kalnischkies2015-12-191-2/+2
| | | | | | | This doesn't allow all tests to run cleanly, but it at least allows to write tests which could run successfully in such environments. Git-Dch: Ignore
* implement dpkgs vision of interpreting pkg:<arch> dependenciesDavid Kalnischkies2015-09-141-12/+19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | How the Multi-Arch field and pkg:<arch> dependencies interact was discussed at DebConf15 in the "MultiArch BoF". dpkg and apt (among other tools like dose) had a different interpretation in certain scenarios which we resolved by agreeing on dpkg view – and this commit realizes this agreement in code. As was the case so far libapt sticks to the idea of trying to hide MultiArch as much as possible from individual frontends and instead translates it to good old SingleArch. There are certainly situations which can be improved in frontends if they know that MultiArch is upon them, but these are improvements – not necessary changes needed to unbreak a frontend. The implementation idea is simple: If we parse a dependency on foo:amd64 the dependency is formed on a package 'foo:amd64' of arch 'any'. This package is provided by package 'foo' of arch 'amd64', but not by 'foo' of arch 'i386'. Both of those foo packages provide each other through (assuming foo is M-A:foreign) to allow a dependency on 'foo' to be satisfied by either foo of amd64 or i386. Packages can also declare to provide 'foo:amd64' which is translated to providing 'foo:amd64:any' as well. This indirection over provides was chosen as the alternative would be to teach dependency resolvers how to deal with architecture specific dependencies – which violates the design idea of avoiding resolver changes, especially as architecture-specific dependencies are a cornercase with quite a few subtil rules. Handling it all over versioned provides as we already did for M-A in general seems much simpler as it just works for them. This switch to :any has actually a "surprising" benefit as well: Even frontends showing a package name via .Name() [which doesn't show the architecture] will display the "architecture" for dependencies in which it was explicitely requested, while we will not show the 'strange' :any arch in FullName(true) [= pretty-print] either. Before you had to specialcase these and by default you wouldn't get these details shown. The only identifiable disadvantage is that this complicates error reporting and handling. apt-get's ShowBroken has existing problems with virtual packages [it just shows the name without any reason], so that has to be worked on eventually. The other case is that detecting if a package is completely unknown or if it was at least referenced somewhere needs to acount for this "split" – not that it makes a practical difference which error is shown… but its one of the improvements possible.
* M-A: allowed pkgs of unconfigured archs do not statisfy :anyDavid Kalnischkies2015-09-141-0/+49
| | | | | | We parse all architectures we encounter recently, which means we also parse packages from architectures which are neither native nor foreign, but still came onto the system somehow (usually via heavy force).
* store ':any' pseudo-packages with 'any' as architectureDavid Kalnischkies2015-09-141-2/+1
| | | | | | | | | | Previously we had python:any:amd64, python:any:i386, … in the cache and the dependencies of an amd64 package would be on python:any:amd64, of an i386 on python:any:i386 and so on. That seems like a relatively pointless endeavor given that they will all be provided by the same packages and therefore also a waste of space. Git-Dch: Ignore
* Fix the test suite againJulian Andres Klode2015-08-171-8/+8
| | | | Gbp-Dch: ignore
* just-in-time creation for (explicit) negative depsDavid Kalnischkies2015-08-101-4/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Now that we deal with provides in a more dynamic fashion the last remaining problem is explicit dependencies like 'Conflicts: foo' which have to apply to all architectures, but creating them all at the same time requires us to know all architectures ending up in the cache which isn't needed to be the same set as all foreign architectures. The effect is visible already now through as this prevents the creation of a bunch of virtual packages for arch:all packages and as such also many dependencies, just not very visible if you don't look at the stats… Git-Dch Ignore
* just-in-time creation for (implicit) ProvidesDavid Kalnischkies2015-08-101-0/+246
Expecting the worst is easy to code, but has its disadvantages e.g. by creating package structures which otherwise would have never existed. By creating the provides instead at the time a package structure is added we are well prepared for the introduction of partial architectures, massive amounts of M-A:foreign (and :allowed) and co as far as provides are concerned at least. We have something relatively similar for dependencies already. Many tests are added for both M-A states and the code cleaned to properly support implicit provides for foreign architectures and architectures we 'just' happen to parse. Git-Dch: Ignore