| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Lots of people have pinned an older version that is no longer
installable, or more common yesterday, we saw a lot of people
who seemingly manually installed a newer version of a deb than
in the repositories, causing the package to be considered obsolete,
which does not make much sense.
Oops: 4c39d922-410f-11f0-bbf9-fa163ec44ecd
Oops: a64054f6-4140-11f0-bbfd-fa163ec44ecd
Oops: a32196c1-661d-11f0-a97c-fa163ec8ca8c
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In case a new version of the source package is published, we
check that if there's a newer binary for the same architecture
and then consider the binary obsoleted.
This logic did not properly account for Architecture: all packages
which are considered as native architecture package with an "All"
multi-arch flag set, and hence a native architecture package may
inadvertently be considered obsoleted by a package that only built
on Architecture: all.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Only move obsolete packages last that are automatically installed,
as we don't want to remove manually installed obsolete packages.
Add some missing const annotations to the operator[] arguments as
well that were needed.
LP: #2100247
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reimplement strict pinning by rejecting the non-candidates when
translating the problem from the depcache to the solver. This is
substantially better than restricting the list of alternatives for
an or group to only include allowed ones for debugging purposes,
albeit a bit slower.
|
|
|
Basically this boils down to checking that the priority of the
source candidate candidate is higher or equal than the priority
of the package's candidate that is being under consideration.
It stands to reason if we maybe we should actually calculate a
source candidate version; this will look similar but may perhaps
perform slightly different.
|
