| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If a method needs a file to operate like e.g. mirror needs to get a list
of mirrors before it can redirect the the actual requests to them. That
could easily be solved by moving the logic into libapt directly, but by
allowing a method to request other methods to do something we can keep
this logic contained in the method and allow e.g. also methods which
perform binary patching or similar things.
Previously they would need to implement their own acquire system inside
the existing one which in all likelyhood will not support the same
features and methods nor operate with similar security compared to what
we have already running 'above' the requesting method. That said, to
avoid methods producing conflicts with "proper" files we are downloading
a new directory is introduced to keep the auxiliary files in.
[The message magic number 351 is a tribute to the german Grundgesetz
article 35 paragraph 1 which defines that all authorities of the
state(s) help each other on request.]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If a InRelease file fails to download with a non-404 error
we assumed there is some general problem with repository like
a webportal or your are blocked from access (wrong auth, Tor, …).
Turns out some server like S3 return 403 if a file doesn't exist.
Allowing this in general seems like a step backwards as 403 is a
reasonable response if auth failed, so failing here seems better
than letting those users run into problems.
What we can do is show our insecure warnings through and allow the
failures for insecure repos: If the repo is signed it is easy to add
an InRelease file and if not you are setup for trouble anyhow.
References: cbbf185c3c55effe47f218a07e7b1f324973a8a6
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There are very many HTTP errorcodes which indicate that the repository
isn't available at the moment or the connection has some kind of
problem. Given that we do not require Release files the result was that
these errors were ignored and the user presented with a message like
"Repository is no longer signed" which sends the user in the wrong
direction.
Instead of trying to figure out which http errorcodes indicate a global
problem we accept only 404 for ignoring and consider all the rest as
hard errors now causing us to stop instantly after the InRelease file
and print the errorcode (with short description from server) received.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
gpg doesn't give use a UID on NODATA, which we were "expecting" (but not
using for anything), but just an error number. Instead of collecting
these as badsigners which will trigger a "invald signature" error with
remarks like "NODATA 1" we instead adapt a message similar to the NODATA
error of a clearsigned file (which is actually not reached anymore as we
split them up, which fails with a NOSPLIT error, which uses the same
general error message).
In other words: Not a security relevant change, just a user experience
improvement as we now point them to the most likely cause of the
problem instead of saying "invalid signature" which would point them in
the direction of the archive being broken (for everyone) instead.
Closes: 823746
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This makes it easier to understand what really is an error
and what not.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This doesn't allow all tests to run cleanly, but it at least allows to
write tests which could run successfully in such environments.
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This allows running tests in parallel.
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
| |
|
|
| |
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reporting errors from Done() is bad for progress reporting and such, so
factoring this out is a good idea and we start with moving the supposed-
to-be clearsigned file isn't clearsigned out first – improving the error
message in the process as we use the same message for a similar case
(NODATA) as this is what I have to look at with the venue wifi at
DebCamp and the old errormessage doesn't really say anything.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We create our own directories here and work without root in them, so we
can also test the locking with them as it is how we usually operate.
Git-Dch: Ignore
|
| |\
| |
| |
| | |
feature/acq-trans
|
| | |\
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Conflicts:
apt-pkg/acquire-item.cc
configure.ac
debian/changelog
doc/apt-verbatim.ent
doc/po/apt-doc.pot
doc/po/de.po
doc/po/es.po
doc/po/fr.po
doc/po/it.po
doc/po/ja.po
doc/po/pt.po
po/ar.po
po/ast.po
po/bg.po
po/bs.po
po/ca.po
po/cs.po
po/cy.po
po/da.po
po/de.po
po/dz.po
po/el.po
po/es.po
po/eu.po
po/fi.po
po/fr.po
po/gl.po
po/hu.po
po/it.po
po/ja.po
po/km.po
po/ko.po
po/ku.po
po/lt.po
po/mr.po
po/nb.po
po/ne.po
po/nl.po
po/nn.po
po/pl.po
po/pt.po
po/pt_BR.po
po/ro.po
po/ru.po
po/sk.po
po/sl.po
po/sv.po
po/th.po
po/tl.po
po/tr.po
po/uk.po
po/vi.po
po/zh_CN.po
po/zh_TW.po
test/integration/test-ubuntu-bug-346386-apt-get-update-paywall
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
downloadfile()
|
| |/ / |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
It is not very extensible to have the supported Hashes hardcoded
everywhere and especially if it is part of virtual method names.
It is also possible that a method does not support the 'best' hash
(yet), so we might end up not being able to verify a file even though we
have a common subset of supported hashes. And those are just two of the
cases in which it is handy to have a more dynamic selection.
The downside is that this is a MAJOR API break, but the HashStringList
has a string constructor for compatibility, so with a bit of luck the
few frontends playing with the acquire system directly are okay.
|
| |/ |
|
| |
|
|
| |
http-method from METHODSDIR
|
|
|
With the selfgrown splitting we got the problem of not recovering
from networks which just reply with invalid data like those sending
us login pages to authenticate with the network (e.g. hotels) back.
The good thing about the InRelease file is that we know that it must
be clearsigned (a Release file might or might not have a detached sig)
so if we get a file but are unable to split it something is seriously
wrong, so there is not much point in trying further.
The Acquire system already looks out for a NODATA error from gpgv,
so this adds a new error message sent to the acquire system in case
the splitting we do now ourselves failed including this magic word.
Closes: #712486
|
