summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* ensure we got a lock in clean operationDavid Kalnischkies2015-12-231-0/+10
| | | | | | We try to acquired the locks, but we didn't stop if we failed to get it… Closes: 808561
* tests: support gpg2 properly in all testcasesDavid Kalnischkies2015-12-194-44/+48
| | | | | | | | | The output changes slightly between different versions, which we already dealt with in the main testcase for apt-key, but there are two more which do not test both versions explicitly and so still had gpg1 output to check against as this is the default at the moment. Git-Dch: Ignore
* avoid evaluating shell in paths used in apt-keyDavid Kalnischkies2015-12-192-3/+21
| | | | | | | | | | | | apt-key creates internally a script (since ~1.1) which it will call to avoid dealing with an array of different options in the code itself, but while writing this script it wraps the values in "", which will cause the shell to evaluate its content upon execution. To make 'use' of this either set a absolute gpg command or TMPDIR to something as interesting as: "/tmp/This is fü\$\$ing cràzy, \$(man man | head -n1 | cut -d' ' -f1)\$!" If such paths can be encountered in reality is a different question…
* tests: support spaces in path and TMPDIRDavid Kalnischkies2015-12-19207-518/+495
| | | | | | | This doesn't allow all tests to run cleanly, but it at least allows to write tests which could run successfully in such environments. Git-Dch: Ignore
* Fix FileUtlTest.GetTempDir failure when run as rootPino Toscano2015-12-191-3/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | Testing /usr as TMPDIR assumes that GetTempDir() cannot use it because it cannot write to it; this is true for non-root users, but not so much for root. Since root can access everything, perform this particular test case only when not running as root. Closes: #808383
* test-apt-download-progress: Run the https test multiple timesJulian Andres Klode2015-12-141-2/+7
| | | | | This filters out errors due to timing issues. Early exits if enough pulses occured.
* pkgcache: Make hash arch-independent using fixed size integerJulian Andres Klode2015-12-141-1/+1
| | | | | | | | This helps writing test cases. Also adapt the test case that expected 64-bit. Nothing changes performance wise, the distribution of the hash values remains intact.
* tagfile: Hardcode error message for out of range integer valuesJulian Andres Klode2015-12-141-1/+1
| | | | | | This makes the test suite work on 32 bit-long platforms. Gbp-Dch: ignore
* test framework: More noopchroot fixesJulian Andres Klode2015-12-141-6/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | Use asprintf() so we have easy error detection and do not depend on PATH_MAX. Do not add another separator to the generated path, in both cases the path inside the chroot is guaranteed to have a leading / already. Also pass -Wall to gcc.
* test framework: Unset no_proxy as wellJulian Andres Klode2015-12-141-1/+1
| | | | | | This caused test-bug-717891-abolute-uris-for-proxies to fail Gbp-Dch: ignore
* test framework: Unset http proxy variables in setupenvironmentJulian Andres Klode2015-12-141-0/+1
| | | | | | This breaks a lot of test cases Gbp-Dch: ignore
* test framework: Correctly generate new paths in noopchrootJulian Andres Klode2015-12-141-6/+5
| | | | | | The allocated buffer was one byte too small. Allocate a buffer of PATH_MAX instead and use snprintf(), as suggested by Martin Pitt.
* test-apt-download-progress: Limit rate to 600kJulian Andres Klode2015-12-141-2/+2
| | | | | | This reduces the chance that the test fails. Gbp-Dch: ignore
* test-apt-download-progress: Allow smaller progress changeJulian Andres Klode2015-12-141-1/+1
| | | | | | | Instead of checking for [10%, 100%), check for (0%, 100%), that is everything < 100% and >0%. Gbp-Dch: ignore
* test-sourceslist-lang-plusminus-options: Use amd64 architectureJulian Andres Klode2015-12-141-1/+1
| | | | | | This should make the test work on non-amd64 systems Gbp-Dch: ignore
* non-existing directories don't need to be cleanedDavid Kalnischkies2015-12-142-2/+27
| | | | | | | | | | Trying to clean up directories which do not exist seems rather silly if you think about it, so let apt think about it and stop it. Depends a bit on the caller if this is fixing anything for them as they might try to acquire a lock or doing other clever things as apt does. Closes: 807477
* support regex and co in 'apt-cache policy $pkg' againDavid Kalnischkies2015-12-141-0/+9
| | | | | | | | | | Regression of 1e064088bf7b3e29cd36d30760fb3e4143a1a49a (1.1~exp4) which moved code around and renamed methods heavily ending up calling the wrong method matching packagenames only instead of calling the full array. Most commands work with versions, so this managed to fly under the radar for quite a while. Closes: 807870
* show a more descriptive error for weak Release filesDavid Kalnischkies2015-12-142-0/+53
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | If we can't work with the hashes we parsed from the Release file we display now an error message if the Release file includes only weak hashes instead of downloading the indexes and failing to verify them with "Hash Sum mismatch" even through the hashes didn't mismatch (they were just weak). If for some (unlikely) reason we have got weak hashes only for individual targets we will show a warning to this effect (again, befor downloading and failing the index itself). Closes: 806459
* Convert package names from Packages files to lower caseJulian Andres Klode2015-12-111-0/+21
| | | | | | | | | dpkg does that when reading package files, so we should do the same. This only deals with parsing names from binary package paragraphs, it does not look at source package names and/or the list of binaries in a dsc file. Closes: #807012
* test: Fix testcases relying on mixed case package namesJulian Andres Klode2015-12-111-23/+23
| | | | Gbp-Dch: ignore
* Do not swap required and important in pkgCache::Priority()Julian Andres Klode2015-12-101-0/+16
| | | | | | | | required and important were swapped, leading to wrong output. Closes: #807523 Thanks: Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo for discovering this
* replace run-parts with find|sort to avoid debianutils usageDavid Kalnischkies2015-12-061-1/+1
| | | | | | | After e75e5879 the reason for an implicit dependency on debianutils (which is essential for debian, but likely not on other systems) was just two uses of run-parts, which can be replaced with the a lot more portable find-piped-into-sort duo.
* replace "which" with "command -v" for portabilityDavid Kalnischkies2015-12-061-1/+1
| | | | | | | | which is a debian specific tool packaged in debianutils (essential) while command is a shell builtin defined by POSIX. Closes: 807144 Thanks: Mingye Wang for the suggestion.
* use @CHANGEPATH@ as placeholder in changelog URI templatesDavid Kalnischkies2015-12-022-9/+9
| | | | | | | | | This should make it more obvious that CHANGEPATH is a placeholder which apt will replace with a package specific path rather than a string constant. Mail-Reference: <87d1upgvaf.fsf@deep-thought.43-1.org> Mail-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/debian-dak/2015/12/msg00005.html
* tests: apt build-dep actually reports no depends correctlyDavid Kalnischkies2015-12-022-2/+14
| | | | | | | | | | 'Regression' of 7d19ee92f2368a40e739cb27d22d6d28f37ebf45, just that it now works more as expected than previously. Of course, build-essentials are implicitly also build dependencies, so by definition all packages have build dependencies, but that isn't what this message wants to say and it isn't what the user expects. Git-Dch: Ignore
* require explicit paths to dsc/control as we do for deb filesDavid Kalnischkies2015-12-012-3/+13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Otherwise a user is subject to unexpected content-injection depending on which directory she happens to start apt in. This also cleans up the code requiring less implementation details in build-dep which is always good. Technically, this is an ABI break as we override virtual methods, but that they weren't overridden was a mistake resulting in pure classes, which shouldn't be pure, so they were unusable – and as they are new in 1.1 nobody is using them yet (and hopefully ever as they are borderline implementation details). Closes: 806693
* accept ../ on the cmdline as start for a deb file as wellDavid Kalnischkies2015-11-291-1/+5
| | | | | | Regression of 14341a7ee1ca3dbcdcdbe10ad19b947ce23d972d. Reported-By: Julian Andres Klode <jak@debian.org>
* tests: fix typos, correct helpmsgs and test testsDavid Kalnischkies2015-11-292-6/+11
| | | | Git-Dch: Ignore
* do not override exact targetrelease matches with lesser matchesAndreas Cadhalpun2015-11-291-0/+20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The relevant testcases are in test/integration/test-apt-get-source. There is a test for #731853 that is supposed to "ensure that apt will pick the higher version number" of 0.0.1 (stable) and 0.1 (stable). However, this works by pure chance, as simply reversing the order of the two insertsource lines makes the test fail. So #731853 isn't really fixed, yet. Actually, that's related to the problem I reported, as the underlying issue for both is the same: In the FindSrc function apt chooses a new 'best hit', if either * there is a target release and it matches the release of the package, * or the version of the package is higher than the last best hit. Consider having 1.0 (stable), 2.0 (unstable) and 1.5 (unstable), in this order. Looking for the version in stable, apt first selects 1.0, because the release matches the target release, but then subsequently selects 2.0, because the version is higher. Looking for the version in unstable, apt first selects 2.0, because the release matches the target release, but then subsequently selects 1.5, because the release also matches the target release. The correct way would be to choose a new 'best hit', if either * there is a target release and it matches the release of the package, * or there is no target release and the version is higher than the last best hit. Closes: 746412 Mail-Reference: <565A604B.7090104@googlemail.com> Mail-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2015/11/msg00470.html
* disable privilege-drop verification by default as fakeroot trips over itDavid Kalnischkies2015-11-281-0/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Dropping privileges is an involved process for code and system alike so ideally we want to verify that all the work wasn't in vain. Stuff designed to sidestep the usual privilege checks like fakeroot (and its many alternatives) have their problem with this through, partly through missing wrapping (#806521), partly as e.g. regaining root from an unprivileged user is in their design. This commit therefore disables most of these checks by default so that apt runs fine again in a fakeroot environment. Closes: 806475
* tests: use id to get user/group instead of environmentDavid Kalnischkies2015-11-281-2/+2
| | | | | | | debci seems to have a cleaner environment now and even if not we could never guess nogroup, so figure it out properly via 'id'. Git-Dch: Ignore
* outsmart gcc -O3 over-optimization in pkgCdrom::FindPackagesDavid Kalnischkies2015-11-271-0/+2
| | | | | | | | Seems like a simpler workaround than forcing a lower optimization level just for this for all of apt. See also: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-5/+bug/1473674
* slightly rephrase notice shown for insecure repositoriesJustin B Rye2015-11-253-5/+5
| | | | Git-Dch: Ignore
* show potentially arch-qualified fullname in 'apt show'David Kalnischkies2015-11-211-9/+26
| | | | | | We do not show the architecture as a dedicated field as this is rather technical information, but as packagename it makes sense to show the architecture as other part of apt will refer to it in this way.
* review of new/changed translatable program stringsJustin B Rye2015-11-215-10/+10
| | | | | Reference mail: https://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-english/2015/11/msg00006.html
* do not sent Last-Modified if we expect a changed fileDavid Kalnischkies2015-11-211-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In 8d041b4f we made apt figure out based on the last Release file it has if it should request a file or not given that the hashes changed or not. So if we have a last Release file and do a request, do not sent a Last-Modified header as we expect a change so much that a non-change would indeed be an error. The Last-Modified header is therefore at best ignored by the server, so sending it is just wasted effort. In the worst case as time is a fragile thing the server decides against sending us an update with the idea that we already have the latest content, which we know for a fact that we haven't. Given that we sent less information to the server our request is on its own also less identifiable as coming from a returning or new user. The disadvantage is that if we end up getting an old index file after getting a new Release file from another mirror the old mirror will not be able to tell us 'Hit', but instead sends us the complete file we discard, but both lets us end up with the same error class in the end, so the difference isn't big in practice.
* ignore lost+found in private directory cleanupDavid Kalnischkies2015-11-192-4/+7
| | | | | | | | | | In ce1f3a2c we started warning about failing unlinking, which we consistently do for directories. That isn't a problem as directories usually aren't in the places we do want to clean up – with the potential exeception of "lost+found", so lets ignore it like we ignore our own partial/ subdirectory. Closes: 805424
* tests: use quiet level 0 by default in testsDavid Kalnischkies2015-11-1929-107/+117
| | | | Git-Dch: Ignore
* support setting empty values (sanely) & removing support forDavid Kalnischkies2015-11-192-16/+79
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | space-gapping: '-o option= value' That is a very old feature (straight from 1998), but it is super surprising if you try setting empty values and instead get error messages or a non-empty value as the next parameter is treated as the value – which could have been empty, so if for some reason you need a compatible way of setting an empty value try: '-o option="" ""'. I can only guess that the idea was to support '-o option value', but we survived 17 years without it, we will do fine in the future I guess. Similar is the case for '-t= testing' even through '-t testing' existed before and the code even tried to detect mistakes like '-t= -b' … all gone now. Technically that is as its removing a feature replacing it with another a major interface break. In practice I really hope for my and their sanity that nobody was using this; but if for some reaon you do: Remove the space and be done. I found the patch and the bugreport actually only after the fact, but its reassuring that others are puzzled by this as well and hence a thanks is in perfect order here as the patch is practical identical [expect that this one here adds tests and other bonus items]. Thanks: Daniel Hartwig for initial patch. Closes: 693092
* do not use _apt for file/copy sources if it isn't world-accessibleDavid Kalnischkies2015-11-194-9/+35
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In 0940230d we started dropping privileges for file (and a bit later for copy, too) with the intend of uniforming this for all methods. The commit message says that the source will likely fail based on the compressors already – and there isn't much secret in the repository content. After all, after apt has run the update everyone can access the content via apt anyway… There are sources through which worked before which are mostly single-deb (and those with the uncompressed files available). The first one being especially surprising for users maybe, so instead of failing, we make it so that apt detects that it can't access a source as _apt and if so doesn't drop (for all sources!) privileges – but we limit this to file/copy, so the uncompress which might be needed will still fail – but that failed before this regression. We display a notice about this, mostly so that if it still fails (e.g. compressed) the user has some idea what is wrong. Closes: 805069
* tests: fail testsuccess if notices are shown, tooDavid Kalnischkies2015-11-181-16/+50
| | | | | | | | Notices are just hints, but if they are printed in tests, they should be expected and if not the test should fail. No current test has this problem, so that is just potential future proving. Git-Dch: Ignore
* "support" unsigned Release files without hashes againDavid Kalnischkies2015-11-051-2/+7
| | | | | | | | | This 'ignores' the component Release files you can find in Debian alongside the binary-* directories, which isn't exactly a common usecase, but it worked before, so lets support it again as this isn't worse than a valid Release file which is unsigned. Git-Dch: Ignore
* encode UTF-8 characters correctly in QuoteStringDavid Kalnischkies2015-11-051-0/+11
| | | | | | | Limit the field length to a char to avoid bogus FF for utf-8 characters with the default length. Closes: 799123
* apply various suggestions made by cppcheckDavid Kalnischkies2015-11-051-1/+1
| | | | | Reported-By: cppcheck Git-Dch: Ignore
* allow acquire method specific options via Binary scopeDavid Kalnischkies2015-11-051-7/+7
| | | | | | | | Allows users who know what they are getting themselves into with this trick to e.g. disable privilege dropping for e.g. file:// until they can fix up the permissions on those repositories. It helps also the test framework and people with a similar setup (= me) to run in less modified environments.
* drop privileges in copy:// method as we do for file://David Kalnischkies2015-11-054-48/+58
| | | | | | | | | | | Continueing on the track of dropping privileges in all methods, lets drop it in copy, too, as the reasoning for it is very similar to file and the interaction between the too quiet interesting as copy kinda surfed as a fallback for file not being able to read the file. Both now show a better error message as well as it was previously claiming to have a hashsum mismatch, given that it couldn't read the file. Git-Dch: Ignore
* allow getaddrinfo flag AI_ADDRCONFIG to be disabledDavid Kalnischkies2015-11-041-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | This flags is generally handy to avoid having to deal with ipv6 results on an ipv4-only system, but it prevents e.g. the testcases from working if the testsystem has no configured address at the moment (expect loopback), so allow it to be sidestepped and let the testcases sidestep it. Git-Dch: Ignore
* ensure FileFd doesn't try to open /dev/null as atomic and coDavid Kalnischkies2015-11-042-0/+34
| | | | | | | | | | The wrapping will fail in the best case and actually end up deleting /dev/null in the worst case. Given that there is no point in trying to write atomically to /dev/null as you can't read from it again just ignore these flags if higher level code ends up trying to use them on /dev/null. Git-Dch: Ignore
* ignore newlines in dpkg-deb control output for installing debsDavid Kalnischkies2015-11-041-0/+29
| | | | | | | | | | | Leading or trailing newlines can be confusing for our parser as it expects two newlines to start/stop a new stanza. To solve this the lines we wanna add are printed first, ignore any leading newlines and then add the stanza as provided by dpkg-deb with or without trailing newlines as the parser will look at the first stanza only anyway and removing trailing newlines is considerably harder to do. Closes: 802553
* support arch:all data e.g. in separate Packages fileDavid Kalnischkies2015-11-0431-123/+330
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Based on a discussion with Niels Thykier who asked for Contents-all this implements apt trying for all architecture dependent files to get a file for the architecture all, which is treated internally now as an official architecture which is always around (like native). This way arch:all data can be shared instead of duplicated for each architecture requiring the user to download the same information again and again. There is one problem however: In Debian there is already a binary-all/ Packages file, but the binary-any files still include arch:all packages, so that downloading this file now would be a waste of time, bandwidth and diskspace. We therefore need a way to decide if it makes sense to download the all file for Packages in Debian or not. The obvious answer would be a special flag in the Release file indicating this, which would need to default to 'no' and every reasonable repository would override it to 'yes' in a few years time, but the flag would be there "forever". Looking closer at a Release file we see the field "Architectures", which doesn't include 'all' at the moment. With the idea outlined above that 'all' is a "proper" architecture now, we interpret this field as being authoritative in declaring which architectures are supported by this repository. If it says 'all', apt will try to get all, if not it will be skipped. This gives us another interesting feature: If I configure a source to download armel and mips, but it declares it supports only armel apt will now print a notice saying as much. Previously this was a very cryptic failure. If on the other hand the repository supports mips, too, but for some reason doesn't ship mips packages at the moment, this 'missing' file is silently ignored (= that is the same as the repository including an empty file). The Architectures field isn't mandatory through, so if it isn't there, we assume that every architecture is supported by this repository, which skips the arch:all if not listed in the release file.
generated by cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2 (git 2.46.0) at 2024-11-02 17:28:19 +0000